Worth repeating
Posted on 03/01/2017 4:39:56 PM PST by drewh
The eas were discreetly covered and I couldn’t detect a hint of nithibg.
A bit sexual, which I am sure was the designer’s intent. How many of those designers that refused to dress the first family were saying “ooh, I wish I designed that!”
She is a beautiful woman, comfortable with her own sexuality. Contrast her dress with anything the skanks of Hollywood were wearing on the red carpet, with their blatant display of body parts.
Or for that matter, contrast her with any of the “witches in white sans hoods.”
Um, could be pre children.
Exactly. And again, whike I would have chosen something a bit more conservative /traditional she is a standout and gorgeous and certainly more apkropri5tgan the slants in white. Btw.. I wonder if they realize the suffragettes were, for the most part, if not all Republican hahaha!!
Worth repeating
Yes, it is. Thanks.
Flour sack... Better!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.