Skip to comments.Bannon Out of NSC? McMaster Prepares To Reorganize Foreign Policy Team
Posted on 02/25/2017 11:13:55 AM PST by GoldenState_Rose
"...veterans of past administrations and members of Congress from both parties criticized the decision to put Mr. Bannon on the principals committee, saying that it risked injecting politics into national security. President George W. Bushs senior adviser, Karl Rove, was generally kept out of sensitive national security meetings. Mr. Obamas senior adviser, David Axelrod, attended some national security meetings but was not given formal status."
"As for Bannon, who may be cut from the NSC, Trump's decision will be carefully watched as such a move would be potentially perceived as a relaxation of Bannon's influence over Trump, a topic which has been of material focus for the press in recent weeks."
(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...
More F-ing fake news from Zero Hedge.
Oh, are they not trustworthy? (Didn’t know)...Drudge touts them sometimes...Though they are only stating what my gut worry was after the initial announcement.
McMaster does not believe that Islam is inherently a danger to us.
He was a bad choice.
I KNOW! :(
I KNOW! :(
More junk/fake news from the Ny Slimes being reborn as new junk/fake news:
But the most notable proposed change has to do with the fate of Steve Bannon on the NSC, who may be removed from the principals committee: “Under the original organization plan last month, Mr. Bannon was invited to attend any National Security Council meeting led by the president and was made a regular member of the so-called principals committee of cabinet secretaries. One senior official supportive of Mr. Bannons position said it would not change under any reorganization. Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary, said this week that Mr. McMaster would have full authority to organize his staff, but that any change in Mr. Bannons status would have to be approved by the president.”
“However, the NYT notes, that veterans of past administrations and members of Congress from both parties criticized the decision to put Mr. Bannon on the principals committee, saying that it risked injecting politics into national security. President George W. Bushs senior adviser, Karl Rove, was generally kept out of sensitive national security meetings. Mr. Obamas senior adviser, David Axelrod, attended some national security meetings but was not given formal status.”
“But Mr. Trump was surprised by the intensity of the blowback to the initial order, and complained that Mr. Flynn had not made him understand the significance of the changes or how they would be perceived, according to senior officials.”
“The NYT explains that White House officials were talking about revising the organization chart even before Mr. McMasters appointment, but the issue came to a head after Mr. Trump asked for Mr. Flynns resignation last week because Mr. Flynn had misled Vice President Mike Pence and other White House officials about what he discussed with Russias ambassador in a December phone call.”
So Zero News, takes warmed over Ny Slimes Fake news and makes it into Junk/Fake News.
Well if that’s what McM believes he may not last long...seems contrary to President
President Trump.....PLEASE DO NOT LET A STRANGER TO YOU OVERRIDE BANNON!!
John McCain is happy with the choice. Another reason I am griping...
We must make this our prayer. Guards immediately should have gone up after the Flynn fiasco.
What do you base your opinion on about Zero Hedge?
“...Bannon’s influence over Trump...”
Maybe influence WITH Trump, but definitely not OVER Trump...
ZeroHedge has some pretty decent articles.
But recently, I have seen some pretty leftist, Opposition Party type articles from them. So....
“He was a bad choice.”
Isn’t he CFR?
We need to push back against these unnamed sources. They are doing the globalist bidfing
This is the media again...they have been trying to get rid of Bannon, Connally, Peibus, Trump’s son in law, Ivanka, and anyone else that is close to him...
I wouldn’t worry about it...Trump and Bannon are closer than you think...
He does not understand Islam if he thinks ISIS is using a perverted interpretation of Islam, they are the closest thing to Mohammed that exists today.
Yes and worse than that he seems to believe that ISIS is not Islamic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.