The decision misreads the Miller case, which, if construed in the narrowest possible way, said that *only* military weapons are protected by the Second Amendment.
Correct, and IIRC, the fact that Miller didn't show up to his appeal, and his attorney did him no favors, it was ruled that a sawed-off shotgun was not a military weapon, thus not protected under the 2nd Amendment. The reality of it is, sawed-off shotguns were used regularly in WWI, and had either Miller or his attorney bothered to show this, the Miller decision would have gone the other way.
I agree, but it doesn’t matter if the decision misreads the revealed Word of God— it is these judges that have the power. If they day Marylanders can’t own an AR15 or a Glock 17, then they can’t own them. The state and the cops will back these judges to the hilt, buried in your back.