Skip to comments.Trump administration won’t appeal ruling against immigration order to the Supreme Court
Posted on 02/10/2017 3:13:46 PM PST by SkyPilot
The Trump administration can wage a legal battle in the lower courts to address more squarely whether the president's immigration directive violates the Constitution. The White House is also mulling whether to rewrite the executive order. No matter what, the administration faces a difficult fight to restore the ban.
This is a developing story. It will be updated.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Sadly, that true.
Ashley Parker @AshleyRParker · 12m12 minutes ago
"Every single court option is on the table, including an appeal of the Ninth Circuit decision on the TRO to the Supreme Court." Reince
Why would the 9th Circus ask for that?
Oops, the quote was from another thread, not you, but the description of an additional judge making the request was current.
The right call. The order was not the greatest, he should’ve put more of his team into place first. Don’t want to go to SCOTUS with a bad decision that needs to be overturned, and then end up with a 4-4 decision letting it stand. If anybody who would’ve been stopped by this order commits a terrorist act, blood will be on their hands, not Trump’s.
Nope.....fake news. All kind of stuff breaking.
Havent read it. do you mean en banc?? All judges
Also, this from the Twitter site you linked:
Mr. Trump has publicly stated many times that he never backs down from a fight when he thinks he’s in the right, so it will be very interesting to see what comes next.
I’ve asked this before, but no answer: If Trump rescinds the first EO and issues another more in line with the Ninth Circuit, doesn’t he by doing so leave the rulings of the court as precedent?
This would be absolutely unacceptable.
Good call. Wait for Gorsuch, but even then, the rogue Kennedy may still cause a problem.
See post #48.
Don't know, but maybe to give the 9th another bite at the apple to strengthen their decision. I can't believe it would be for any reason to help the Administration or further justice.
Cuz it will still be appealed to the USSC eventually.
There and possibly legal action in other court circuits and likely new EOs next week. Trump going to challenge this usurpation for 8 years if it has to takes that long. Start changing the courts to Constitutional following judges. 100 plus opening right now.
And WI, PA and MI....courtesy of one Kelly Anne Conway.
In law, an en banc session (French for “in bench”) is a session in which a case is heard before all the judges of a court (before the entire bench) rather than by a panel of judges selected from them.
The travel ban was heard by three judges, en banc rules for the 9th circuit would mean a minimum of 11 judges and a maximum of twenty-five judges would rule on the lawsuit.
En banc is limited in the 9th Circus court because of so many judges. IIRC.....11 judges. Not sure if it is different there when a judge asks for it.
Good. Later. Reissue the order reworded. Alan Dersowich said to redo the order.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.