More WINNING!
Trump 1
Intelligence agencies 0
It’s telling that these liberal propaganda arms of the Democrats think letting the voters see what the Clinton team wrote in e-mails would help Trump.
It’s an admission that things the Clinton team did and said in secret would hurt them in the election.
Washington Post is still around?
WaPo has been in complete meltdown mode since Trump chastised them...Hilarious!
Why play this charade?
Why not just produce hard evidence or proof of Russian government involvement? Or are they afraid of what it will reveal? Are they afraid the Russians will produce some evidence of their own?
This “Russian Hacking” gambit was always targeted at the Republican base, to put a wedge between trump and the base.
The left and neocons (but I repeat myself) miscalculated. I regard the US left as a greater threat than Russia to US prosperity and freedom, and I don’t think I’m alone.
...and...
“Serious and VERIFIED” charges must always be ignored, unless they are made against a Republican.
MSM persuading citizens that there’s no longer any reason to suffer the MSM to live.
Hillary is crooked because of the Rooskies?
The devil made me do it excuse.
Uh….hasn’t it dawned on the Washington Compost that less than 1 in 10 conservatives believes anything any federal government agency tells us? We have been lied to hundreds, yea, thousands of times, and we are not stupid.
Why shouldn’t we doubt it ? I don;t need Trump to tell me that over the last 8 years Obama has purged and subverted virtually every Federal Gov agency , including all Intel agencies with the placement of people willing to support HIS agenda and he has exorcised out everyone that wasn’t on board . Military leadership included . Trump should trust their ‘products’ further than he can spit and the moment he gets in he should do a total purge of his own . Start over . Lot’s of good and talented VETS out there that need jobs and are highly qualified . Get rid of ALL of Obamas political minions . Every single one . No remainder
Sorry but Trump doesn’t think for me. I do my research and draw my own conclusions.
I don’t recall the MSM or democrats getting upset about Sarah Palin’s emails being hacked or Newt Gingrich’s phone calls being intercepted and recorded.
Besides, even if the Russians did this what is the real problem? the democrats don’t deny the content of the e-mails and that is their real problem; too many people now know exactly what the rats think of them.
When did Hussein know H->! was running an ILLEGAL Server?
Why did Hussein use this ILLEGAL Server to communicate with H->! ?
First of all Russia did not hack the election. Period. The voting machines are not connected to the internet, so that would have been impossible.
Transmission of results might have been vulnerable, but the verification process that state’s follow after the election would have identified any discrepancy. So that didn’t happen either.
The only “hacking” that we know about, came from DHS attempting to access systems in several states, which the NEWS has failed to report or inquire why the Federal Government was trying to do that.
WikiLeaks data on Clinton came from a disgruntled insider - that’s from Julian Assange, and a couple of former British Ambassadors-one of whom claimed to have received the information from that person in Washington DC.
There are suspicions that the person may have been Seth Rich who was the victim of an unsolved murder/robbery in which nothing was taken- unless he had some additional info on a thumb drive that was taken. Assange would not confirm nor deny that Rich was a source-but he did post a reward for info to solve the mystery.
I have not heard how Guccifer got info, but I believe he was a Romanian. Nor have I heard anything about DCLeaks.
In addition, Podesta fell for a fishing scam and gave his password to some unidentified group and gave them his password - which was password. Showing how incompetent he and the staff he depended on were.
The FBI and IC did not get to examine the DNC equipment. They relied on information from the Company that Hillary and her Cohorts hired-a completely unbiased source/s
In addition, Weiner’s laptop had information that the NYPD obtained, and that was handed over to the FBI. No telling who might have had access to that.
The most recent FBI dump indicates that Hillary did send confidential information to Blumenthal, from her private non-legal server, and that info was hacked. It was hacked by the Russians, Chinese, and Israel-so that mitigates a main reason that Comey used to justify non prosecution.
There is also evidence to suggest that some people in the NSA/IC lost agents (ie they died)as a result of Clinton’s incompetence, and they are releasing info because they didn’t want her to be their boss.
Industrialized Countries hack each other all the time. That’s why Hillary shouldn’t have had that home-brewed set up.
Bottom line. Russia did not “hack” the election. A DNC insider leaked information which showed Hillary’s dirty tricks and corruption. None of which has been disputed. The earlier leaks (not necessarily WikiLeaks) resulted in a lawsuit filed in Florida, which was eventually settled, and ouster of the head of DNC.
Hacking the RNC did not happen, because they had good enough security to prevent it.
DNC learn a lesson - don’t do criminal acts, dirty tricks, and if you do, don’t put them in your email and use something that’s easy to guess as your password (password - was a dumb choice).
Compost bump for later.....
I am sick of hearing this “Hacking” word.
There were no votes changed, and nobody really seemed
to show concern over multiple previously accessed data/internet accounts.
The Narrative of Hillary Clinton being a LIAR has dropped off the Radar.
Hillary lost the Election for any number of reasons, take your pick, —— however “Hacking” is not the culprit. Where is all the Evidence of this altering (empirical evidence), of the Election, Specifically?