Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spel_grammer_an_punct_polise

The Space Shuttle did have engines. It had to turn backwards and fire them to reduce speed and fall out of orbit. These engines were nothing compared to the two solid rocket boosters with 1 million pounds of propellant or the Main Booster with over a half million gallons of liquid propellant.


52 posted on 12/28/2016 9:44:34 PM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: MtnClimber

“The Space Shuttle did have engines.”

Of course, you are correct. Please let me rephrase:

The space shuttle did not have air-breathing engines that could operate in the atmosphere. ;-)


53 posted on 12/28/2016 9:47:31 PM PST by spel_grammer_an_punct_polise (Note to all foreigners: Please.....GET OUT and STAY OUT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber
These engines were nothing compared to the two solid rocket boosters with 1 million pounds of propellant or the Main Booster with over a half million gallons of liquid propellant.

The space shuttle actually did not have a main booster. The thing in the middle was just a big tank that fueled the 3 engines on the orbiter during take off. According to Wikipedia, each of the three orbiter engines had 393,800 pounds of thrust at lift off and each solid rocket booster had 2,800,000.

74 posted on 12/28/2016 11:02:31 PM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson