Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brooklyn Attitude
I think they way evolutionist label individual species kind of undermines their whole argument.

Look at humans: I think it goes like this homo-halibus->homo-erectus->homo-sapien. That is not a smooth transition. I will use a car analogy. The three human species are like the '55,'56 and '57 Chevy. These are distinct models. There are no 55 1/2 Chevys with a blended design incorporating some features of the '56 model year. Now the cars may share the same sealed beam headlight assembly, the eye equivalent in humans, but that does not mean they are not distinct and different designs. You cannot swap a fender from a '56 Chevy with a '57.

To my knowledge there are no homo-erectus/homo sapien cross breed transitional fossils. Same with every species in the chain of human development.

This is my observation a trained engineer.

95 posted on 12/17/2016 8:54:29 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: central_va

I don’t see much of an analogy between biological procreation and 1950s model Chevys. Unless it procreation done in the back seats of 1950-ish Chevys.

That’s my observation also as a trained but “not-overly-interested-these-’ How Many Angels Can Dance On The Head Of A Pin’- arguments” engineer!


96 posted on 12/17/2016 9:16:08 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson