[discostu]

The big thing you’re missing is that the situation is very messy. At the same time you have Erectus you also have Habilis, and then there’s Neanderthal and yes there ARE fossils showing combinations of these that eventually leads to Sapiens. Check out things like heidelbergensis. A big problem the anti-science folks run into is that you over simplify everything, then act like the fact that it doesn’t fit into your simple model means the science is wrong. Meanwhile, out in reality, things are messy, transitions are rough, multiple species in the same chain coexist as one takes over, they interbreed, this causes short lived off shoots.

The more abusive you get the more we both know you’re full of crap. Meanwhile, I got stuff to do. But don’t let that stop you from throwing more insults that serve no purpose but to prove you wrong.

[central_va]

Anti-science, really? I have two engineering bachelors degrees as such I have studied science in a formal university environment. It seems more and more questioning evolution causes really strange reaction in the evolutionist. Both are religions.

How about anti silly science.

Here is the crossover species you are referring too? I am not buying it

According to Tim White, it is probable that Rhodesian Man was the ancestor of Homo sapiens idaltu (Herto Man), which itself was the ancestor of Homo sapiens sapiens.[25] The skull has cavities in ten of the upper teeth and is considered one of the oldest known occurrences of cavities. Pitting indicates significant infection before death and implies that the cause of death may have been due to dental disease infection or possibly chronic ear infection.[7]