Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reasonisfaith

It is totally found. Have you never bothered to look at the biological tree of life?

Oh wait, I already know your answer, you remain unconvinced. Meanwhile, out here in reality, where the facts live, speciation is real, and exactly that evidence exists.


147 posted on 12/18/2016 11:59:27 AM PST by discostu (Alright you primative screwheads, listen up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: discostu

If dogs were preceded by another species (call it species a) that evolved into dogs, then species a would have been preceded by species b, and species b by c, c by d, d by e, and so on for as many species as there are successful groups or sets of morphological changes. Species a and species b would have to be very similar, as would species d and e, f and g, q and r, and so on.

The number of these species required if evolution is true is exponentially higher than the number of species observed.

There is no such species a, or b, c, d, e, etc for dogs. Not to mention for ostriches, sharks, chipmunks, wolverines, gila monsters or any other. No species is associated with anything even close to the trajectory of species assumed by the theory of speciation.


148 posted on 12/18/2016 12:09:34 PM PST by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

To: discostu

If dogs were preceded by another species (call it species a) that evolved into dogs, then species a would have been preceded by species b, and species b by c, c by d, d by e, and so on for as many species as there are successful groups or sets of morphological changes. Species a and species b would have to be very similar, as would species d and e, f and g, q and r, and so on.

The number of these species required if evolution is true is exponentially higher than the number of species observed.

There is no such species a, or b, c, d, e, etc for dogs. Not to mention for ostriches, sharks, chipmunks, wolverines, gila monsters or any other. No species is associated with anything even close to the trajectory of species assumed by the theory of speciation.


149 posted on 12/18/2016 12:09:34 PM PST by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

To: discostu

Like everyone I know and everyone you know I was introduced to the “biological tree of life” as a very young child, and have been reminded of it often throughout the years. Back then I was just as curious as any other boy about things such as this.

In those days I used to play with a boy my age, we were around 3 or 4 at the time. He would come over to my house, we would play for several hours and then we would fight and he would go home. Once in a while I think of this boy.

Who knows. Maybe, by some fantastic twist of fate, you are that same boy, now grown, meeting me here on this forum. If so, I would very much like to apologize to you for my pugnacious inclination so many years ago. Let our friendship go on and the bad behavior be left behind.


150 posted on 12/18/2016 12:24:16 PM PST by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson