Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump: Cancel Boeing's Contract For Air Force One
The Hill ^ | December 6, 2016 | By Harper Neidig

Posted on 12/06/2016 6:45:36 AM PST by Fennie

President-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday ripped Boeing for the cost of a new Air Force One plane, calling for the contract to be cancelled.

"Boeing is building a brand new 747 Air Force One for future presidents, but costs are out of control, more than $4 billion. Cancel order!" Trump tweeted.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: aerospace; airforce; boeing; trump; trumptransition

1 posted on 12/06/2016 6:45:36 AM PST by Fennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fennie
I liked Rich Lowry's quip on Foxnews, "He'll learn to love it."
2 posted on 12/06/2016 6:47:04 AM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

They’ll be on his front stoop in short order asking what they can do to save the order.


3 posted on 12/06/2016 6:48:47 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

Yep, I have the feeling that savings will be found in short order.


4 posted on 12/06/2016 6:53:48 AM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
Seattle - Chicago

How is that Boeing deal going?

5 posted on 12/06/2016 7:16:16 AM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Does the contract money include the commo and jamming gear?


6 posted on 12/06/2016 7:37:18 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
Several years back, I visited the Lockheed Martin plant which was designing replacement presidential helicopters. They proudly (?) bragged that one of the requirements for the design was that the president must be able to stand ANYWHERE around the hull of the aircraft, and see his reflection in the paint.

These are the kinds of things that drive the costs, and Trump is absolutely right in cancelling the order. However, I place the blame on the government, not Boeing, and Boing should be compensated for their costs to date. It is the government bureaucracies that drive up costs, not business.

7 posted on 12/06/2016 7:45:20 AM PST by norwaypinesavage (always)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

“Does the contract money include the commo and jamming gear?”

The high costs must include all the unique features, which likely include defensive equipment. Also the current practice is to have 2 essentially duplicate aircraft, so that’s probably also a reason for the high costs.

Sounds more like a shot across Boeing’s bow. Let the negotiations begin. I’m sure there’s a lot that can be negotiated once Trump is in office, also imagine there are a lot of crazy requirements in place simply because it’s a Government contract, much of which a little thought would lead to the conclusion they are either not necessary or the objective could be accomplished in a much cheaper manner.

Long ago I was a project engineer on a major defense contract that had a problem because a particular reporting requirement had not been flowed down to subcontractors. Took a look at what was being required and discussed it with my Government counterpart who was to receive the reports, figured out a better way to get what he really needed and submitted the first Value Engineering Change proposal for that program - saved $8M which was split between the USG and the contractor. There are likely lots of opportunities.


8 posted on 12/06/2016 7:53:47 AM PST by LibertyOh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

I’d think a formation of several identical-looking planes would be safer because because the bad guys wouldn’t know which one had the president.


9 posted on 12/06/2016 8:11:09 AM PST by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

How many planes with spare parts are they building for that price?


10 posted on 12/06/2016 9:33:15 AM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson