1 posted on
12/05/2016 10:34:28 AM PST by
usafa92
To: usafa92
To: usafa92
One cannot trust these leftwing Alinsky communists - they will stop at nothing to complete their coup d’etat.
3 posted on
12/05/2016 10:39:25 AM PST by
newfreep
("If Lyin' Ted was an American citizen, he would be a traitor.")
To: usafa92
5 posted on
12/05/2016 10:41:24 AM PST by
madison10
(Pray continuously for Trump/Pence)
To: usafa92
I thought it was a Federal District judge that ordered the MI hand recount.
How can a MI court of appeals change that Fed ruling?
MI is part of the 6th circuit, IIRC, and it’s in Cincinnati.
6 posted on
12/05/2016 10:42:48 AM PST by
xzins
To: usafa92
I think AG Schuette is intent on shoving this down the leftists throat and hoping they choke on it!
11 posted on
12/05/2016 10:51:44 AM PST by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
To: usafa92; LS
16 posted on
12/05/2016 10:55:08 AM PST by
max americana
(For the 9th time FIRED LIBERALS from our company at this election, and every election since 2008)
To: usafa92
The Evil Rats are trying to delay/STOP the electoral college vote.
20 posted on
12/05/2016 10:57:45 AM PST by
CivilWarBrewing
(Females DESTROYED America.)
To: usafa92
The MI court gonna tell the feds to pound sand? I’d love it.
40 posted on
12/05/2016 11:24:49 AM PST by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: usafa92
Big problem >> Liberal Democrat Judges — They will do everything they can to subvert the Electoral College.
Thank God we control the House of Representatives. We may need it.
To: usafa92
There appear to be two issues here.
1. Whether the recount is authorized by MI law. (Here, our side is arguing that it's not because Stein is not "an aggrieved party on account of fraud or mistake", because her petition was not properly notarized, etc)
2. Whether the MI 2 day waiting period for the recount is constitutional.
I read the Goldsmith opinion, and he decided issue #2, said the 2 day waiting period was not constitutional as applied to this case.
But can someone explain to me why the fed court's decision on MI's 2-day waiting period law could override the MI courts' decision on issue #1? Goldsmith opinion said nothing about whether the MI law requiring an "aggrieved party on account of fraud or mistake" is constitutional.
So why can't the MI courts decide issue #1 in accordance with their law?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson