Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Makes Case for Electoral College
Townhall.com ^ | November 15, 2016 | Jason Hopkins

Posted on 11/15/2016 9:58:25 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: All

If it’s true that they don’t count all the votes once a state is declared, that’s not a good thing, count all the votes. Whatever the impact on the popular vote, I don’t really care about that aspect, just count all the votes.

It’s important that everyone would know the actual outcome of the election rather than making assumptions.

Also, it’s just an invitation to voter fraud to have large stacks of uncounted votes, what’s to stop dishonest officials from sending off presumed unwanted opposition votes to that never-counted room?


21 posted on 11/15/2016 10:35:12 AM PST by Peter ODonnell (Listen for my radio call-in program on channel A in your brain, yes caller ... I'm listening)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Yulee
If the Electoral College was made up of members, who vote how their individual Congressional Districts voted, we would really see the Presidency reflect the wishes of American Voters at the time of the Presidential Election.

I believe this is what the Founding Fathers intended prior to the development of political parties.


I agree with you. And I don't think there's anything stopping any state from adopting this. 48 out of 50 states adopt the "winner take all" approach, but I believe it is up to them ultimately to determine their electors and there is nothing a federal mandate constitutionally can or should do to change that.

IIRC, a state could even forgo a popular vote entirely and decide to choose their electors based on a different method, for example a state legislature vote.
22 posted on 11/15/2016 10:36:47 AM PST by mmichaels1970 (Hillary lied over four coffins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe

“In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse [sic] from them by Ballot the Vice President.”


Seems the intent was that the person receiving the second highest number of Electoral College votes, would be Vice-President. Of course this was prior to the development of political parties and running a candidate for both President and Vice-President on the same ticket.

Is there a law establishing that both the Presidential Candidate and Vice-Presidential Candidate be on the same ticket?


23 posted on 11/15/2016 10:37:40 AM PST by Yulee (Village of Albion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Prager University has an excellent video on the Electoral College. Watch
24 posted on 11/15/2016 10:40:01 AM PST by mc5cents (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Some are even saying his victory is illegitimate because he did not win over the majority of voters

Neither did Bill Clinton - twice.
25 posted on 11/15/2016 10:41:07 AM PST by stylin19a (obama = Fredo smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Too many folks in influence continue to ignore the millions of illegal votes cast by noncitizens each election. Trump won the popular vote of legally cast votes by CITIZENS!!!

The sole reason Clinton “won” the popular vote was due to massive noncitizen voter fraud!

Thank God for the Electoral College!!

http://dennismichaellynch.com/obama-tells-illegal-dreamer-ok-vote/


26 posted on 11/15/2016 10:41:18 AM PST by dsm69 (Boycott News Media/Hollywood Advertisers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yulee
Is there a law establishing that both the Presidential Candidate and Vice-Presidential Candidate be on the same ticket?

I'm no expert. But my guess is that there can be no FEDERAL law requiring this. I believe the method by which electors are selected in a presidential election is left entirely up to the states. However we live in a time where all 50 of the states have determined that every electoral vote cast for president is required to cast the same party vote for vice president.

However, I'm not aware of anything that would prevent a state from changing its mind. For example, I believe a state could choose to have separate popular votes to determine a slate of electors for president and vp, thereby making it possible that the its electors might go with one party for president and another for vp.

Don't take my word on that though, I just think its a fun conversation to have.
27 posted on 11/15/2016 10:46:38 AM PST by mmichaels1970 (Hillary lied over four coffins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I was worried about his criticism of the Electoral College in the 60 Minutes interview, but this clarification shows that he is listening to good people and is still willing to learn.


28 posted on 11/15/2016 10:52:50 AM PST by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Staten Island and Suffolk counties, New York went red. So ratio is worse than depicted.


29 posted on 11/15/2016 10:56:30 AM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mmichaels1970

“IIRC, a state could even forgo a popular vote entirely and decide to choose their electors based on a different method, for example a state legislature vote.”

Very true.

Site below lets you see how different suggestions for reform would effect the 2012 election. Can’t wait to see the 2016 models.

http://www.270towin.com/alternative-electoral-college-allocation-methods/


30 posted on 11/15/2016 10:57:25 AM PST by Yulee (Village of Albion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ronaldus Magnus
I was worried about his criticism of the Electoral College in the 60 Minutes interview, but this clarification shows that he is listening to good people and is still willing to learn.

Quite the pleasant opposite from that arrogant pos who currently occupies 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, isn't it?

31 posted on 11/15/2016 11:04:55 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

The face of urban squalor!


32 posted on 11/15/2016 11:06:45 AM PST by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Because he wants to be president of All Americans. Unlike 0bama who made it clear many times that he wanted to be president only to the democrats regardless of color.


33 posted on 11/15/2016 11:11:04 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

I sure hope some of those idiots did not talk her into changing her mind.


34 posted on 11/15/2016 11:15:45 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Ive never heard of Chesterton’s fence. But understand the principal implicitly. It under a personal Axiom “things have a reason”and “what are you trying to accomplish”

In any groupe there will be policies and procedures that you don’t understand or people have forgotten why they’re doing it.

but you cannot remove it willy-nilly

Examine the policy and see what it was put in place for what was it trying to accomplish what was its reason

Once you understand what its intent was then you can make modifications.or not if needed

it’s like disassembling and putting back together a car you don’t leave out of parts of because you don’t understand exactly what the part does... what was its reasons what was it there to accomplish?

you have to understand what it does so you can properly put it back together when you repairing it


35 posted on 11/15/2016 11:22:37 AM PST by tophat9000 (Tophat9000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents

Thanks for the link. The video is excellent and very encouraging.


36 posted on 11/15/2016 11:24:16 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

The left is all about fairness, isn’t it?


No


37 posted on 11/15/2016 11:40:11 AM PST by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
A lot of Trump-haters are criticizing Trump for winning the Electoral College, but not the popular vote. Some are even saying his victory is illegitimate because he did not win over the majority of voters.

but, 3 million votes were cast by illegal aliens and absentee ballots were never tabulated by most states. The real fact is, Trump won the majority of legitimate votes, whether those crybabies like it or not.


38 posted on 11/15/2016 12:20:34 PM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

Great graphic. And those numbers are IN SPITE OF the cheating Hillary’s side did.


39 posted on 11/15/2016 12:35:00 PM PST by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

People have accused me of excessive optimism at times in my life so my new goal is to have Los Angeles county go Red in 2020. Wish me luck, I figure I need to start knocking on doors tomorrow. :)


40 posted on 11/15/2016 12:44:14 PM PST by Shark24 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson