Posted on 10/18/2016 11:55:31 AM PDT by fishtank
Shameless Bias in Presidential Science
Posted on October 16, 2016
Why do science news sites go after the Republican candidate only?
This is another arena Donald Trump could show is rigged.
This entry is about news bias; it does not take sides. Readers are free to make their own conclusions about the better candidate. But a fair result can only come from getting facts straight and reporting them with balance. Since these news sites quoted below often defend Darwinian evolution, its instructive to see if their bias on that subject shares commonalities with bias in the political arena.
All the Lies That Are Fit to Print ...
(Excerpt) Read more at crev.info ...
crev.info article image
I remember how vile the Crevo threads got here on this Christian owned and operated site. Tells a lot about the quality of conservatism we have today that has been invaded by Libertarians.
Why? Because Democrats are a much more prolific and reliable source of grant money. When the government pays for science it is all political science.
Government money certainly can corrupt scientific research. We have also had spectacular breakthroughs in science from government financed research.
In this case, I think the media is the corrupting agent. Any show that is not reliably leftist does not last long.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.