Posted on 10/17/2016 6:43:51 PM PDT by Javeth
"If you want a nuclear war in support of al-Qaida, vote Hillary. If you want to prevent a nuclear war and fight al-Qaida, vote Trump."
This should be the headline quote that Donald leaves voters with from the debate on Wednesday. This is the sweet, to-the-point power statement that'll stick with people, nothing less than the path to victory in November because it'll bring millions more independents and wavering Democrats to our side. I posted earlier after an observation from the second debate, where even highly deluded Democrats began to waver in their Hillary support on hearing of her no-fly-zone plans in Syria and calls for "leverage" against Russia, which they interpreted as a push towards WW3. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3478694/posts
We talked here about making an similar to the one LBJ used against Barry Goldwater in 1964, but in this case backed up Hillary's own war-fever statements against Russia, showing how she intends to start World War 3. And all for the cause of helping al-Qaida and ISIS terrorists who hate the United States and American citizens. A true globalists war, anti-American at its heart.
This is important, because when we're working to win over new voters, we can't preach to our own choir. All the efforts using Hillary's email corruption, Benghazi, the candidates statements or other approaches don't work, even the wavering Dems have drunk too much Kool-Aid. We have to win them over by appealing on their own turf. Hillary's crazy war fever against Russia, for the sake of supporting al-Qaida and ISIS terrorists in Syria, is just the way to do that. Even the most deluded Democrats are afraid of that, and when we install that little bit of gnawing fear in them that Hillary indeed intends WW3, somethign that would hit them directly and not be so abstract, that's what actually gets them to vote for Trump.
Starting last week, I tested out this conjecture by talking to 11 people among my family and friends who are Hillary supporters (we all have 'em), who I've been trying for a year to convince to support Trump as best for their own interests. Nothing, and I mean nothing has worked to win them over. (Fears of terrorism actually did make some headway surprisingly, especially in Minnesota after those stabbings, but not enough.) Until now.
When I started pointing out how Hillary in her own words has called for a no-fly-zone in Syria that would bring the United States into direct conflict with Russia, possibly leading to a nuclear war-- and all for the sake of supporting Syrian "rebels" who are al-Qaida and ISIS terrorists-- this finally had an effect. Unlike all the other attempts at persuasion, which were either too abstract or things they could rationalize away, the fear of World War 3 caused by Hillary's reckless and erratic hatred of Putin and need to "look tough", finally got through to them.
Pointing out Hillary's genuine threat to start a massive war with Russia, for such a dumb justification, really hit them in their guts because it raised legitimate fears of something that would directly have a terrible effect on them-- the most powerful motivator.
In the past week alone, only one of those eleven people is still supporting Hillary, and even then only reluctantly and worriedly. The other 10 are either on the fence, going third party or, in many cases, voting for Trump-- and these are, for the most part, Democrats who've been able to rationalize away every other awful, criminal thing Hillary has done. They can't do that with fears of Hillary causing World War 3, this really scares them, and Donald Trump actually looks much more reasonable on this.
As a sidenote I even got come confirmation about the power of this approach when hearing from one of my Democratic friends that the Dems are themselves embroiled in a civil war about Hillary's war plans. Most of the Democrats grass roots is strongly against the Syria and Russia war plans, while the leaders are in favor of it. So they began perma-banning Democrats who opposed the war fever from Democratic sites to give an illusion of consensus, which has only led to other Dem sites popping up that are actively attacking Hillary for the war fever.
The Hillary = World War 3 line of attack is our most powerful political weapon, and should be given priority over all other lines of attack. This is the one that goes outside our tent and really reaches the independents and wavering Dems at the gut level where they make their decisions, and bring them over to our side. Again if anyone has contacts within the Trump campaign, please do everything possible to help get up the re-make of the 1964 LBJ-vs.-Goldwater ad like we talked about in the previous post-- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3478694/posts
Hillary's very vulnerable to this, and it would be poetic justice to use this same sort of ad against her, using her own words to show she wants a major with Russia for foolish reasons, and placing Hillary's own words alongside mushroom clouds in US cities, and the 9/ll attacks being carried out by the same al-Qaida terrorists that Hillary is supporting. Get the word out to make this ad, and have Donald Trump deliver a short, pithy line on debate night that summarizes the situation just like above. It's a simple statement that says a lot and will stay with people, and it will lead to victory for the Trump campaign.
Who said this? If you, not so much. If someone outside the two camps, gold.
In fact this is the sort of sound-bite that should be repeated by the Trump campaign over and over, not only at the debate but at campaign stops all over here. Get it inside people’s heads. Let it incubate there, and it’ll make people’s decisions when they go into the voting booth.
Trump debate pointers.
Trump: This is how I will bring us back from the brink of war with Russia.
This is how I will help wages rise that are stagnant.
This is how I will deal with current corruption in government.
This is how I will provide for the lack of accountability in government.
This is how I will keep foreign money out of politics.
State what is broken and then tell us how he will fix it.
He is running against the status quo, demonstrate the problems and then state his positive actions providing for a better future.
Nutty
If they create enough fraud, intimidation and chaos and Clinton steals the election she’d go into this with terrible combative relationship with Russia. Ya better get it right this time America.
As US Russian relationships continue to sour, Hillary wants a no fly zone in Syria. Enforcing one by force against Russians will be viewed as an act of war by Russia.
Vladimir Zhirinovsky, a staunch ally of Putin, said that Trump was the only person able to de-escalate dangerous tensions between Moscow and Washington
He said Americans should vote for Donald Trump as president next month or risk being dragged into a nuclear war if they vote for Hillary.
I wonder if they’ll nuke Milwaukee . . .
I actually agree on some variation of this. That after ruining the middle east by being weak, now they are risking war with Russia to hide their crimes, and we are facing endless wars if she gets in office.
It seems that Hillary, and Obama, want this nuclear war against Russia for some dumb reason. Maybe just to save face for totally screwing up so many countries in so little time? Or the fact that Russia provided proof that US led terrorists are using the gas weapons in Syria?
And that risk would be very real. The American people no longer have trust or faith in this government. Zip. We can imagine how the Russians must feel.
Yeah, possibly this. Hillary and her band of crooks are the very worst sort of elitists, they don’t care if they turn America into a steaming nuclear wasteland since they figure, they’ll be safe and sound down in their bunkers, only the plebians and masses of deplorables would pay the price for her stupidity. Hillary embodies the very worst sort of moral sin in anyone pretending to be a leader, she combines arrogance, stupidity, and recklessness with contempt and disregard for the people of the country she claims she wants to lead. She’s like a medieval monarch but with much more dangerous weapons than they ever had. People are just pawns to her, Huma Abedin, Sindey Blumenthal, John Podesta, the neocons and the other crooks in her circle of corruption and hedonism.
An air of inevitability. Perhaps some pity for Crooked.
Clinton and the Democrats have been accusing Russia and offering no evidence, and now it comes out - from Chelsea Clinton no less - that the e-mail leaks are internal.
ANOTHER foreign policy failure, a very dangerous failure that may lead to WWIII
The accusations are also used as a pretense for federal control of elections.
The Democrats want to seize control of elections, the train and pay people to disrupt their opponent, they make crazy accusations - THEY ARE DANGEROUS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.