Posted on 10/11/2016 6:00:24 AM PDT by libstripper
Fraudulent Polls are designed to mask fraudulent voters when the final count is tallied.
thank you, as always
Excellent.
Large pop states like CA, NY tend to skew national polls D. Exclude those, and exclude the obviously red deep south/north Plains and the obviously blue NE far NW, and your “battleground areas” run from +2-3 R to about +6-7 D, but the Ds in those states are more flexible-—working class, blue collar, farmers, etc. Not hard core welfare recipients.
Gallup said in 2012 that exits showed we were 50/50. I don’t think that’s right, certainly not on a national level, but in MOST battleground states D+1 or 2 is about right.
In less than two hours it was posted three times....maybe your search term was too spevific
Right....and this goes to the point that if you shift about 250K votes to Romney in key states, he actually wins...notwithstanding the 4% difference nationally.
Did the state by state turnout R/D percentages in 2012 comport with primary turnout numbers? If so....using the same methodology...then we can assume greater Trump turnout in the general, b/c of his enthusiasm and record-setting turnout in the primary. (Right?)
Precisely. The key number actually was 470,000 in five states, with OH 170,000 and FL 74,000.
thank you
I posted the entire title.
Here
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3479091/posts
and here
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3479086/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.