Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Admin Secretly Scouted US Cities to Move Gitmo Terrorists: Admin Efforts Violation of US Law
The Washington Free Beacon ^ | October 3, 2016 8:05 pm gmt | BY: Adam Kredo

Posted on 10/03/2016 6:10:23 PM PDT by drewh

The Obama administration secretly used taxpayer money to fund an official inspection of several U.S. cities as possible locations to move terrorist inmates held at the Guantanamo Bay prison camp in violation of federal law, the Washington Free Beacon has learned.

The Obama administration ordered the Pentagon to spend U.S. taxpayer funds for a domestic search of “possible Guantanamo detainee relocation” sites, according to documents obtained by the Free Beacon. United States law bars the administration from spending taxpayer money on its effort to move Gitmo inmates onto American soil.

The disclosure has prompted a congressional inquiry to determine who in the Obama administration ordered the relocation search and how taxpayer funds were authorized for that purpose, according to a formal letter sent by lawmakers to the Defense Department on Monday and obtained by the Free Beacon.

The disclosure of this activity by the Obama administration has renewed concerns on Capitol Hill that the White House will make a last-minute effort to shutter the Gitmo prison and ship the remaining inmates to the United States, despite laws prohibiting the transfers.

Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt informed lawmakers in a letter late last month that he had discovered documentation showing the Obama administration spent more than $25,000 to scout potential relocation sites in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, Charleston, South Carolina, and Florence, Colorado.

Schmidt obtained this information from the Pentagon only after threatening to sue the administration for its refusal to produce documentation on the matter.

“While the amount of money is relatively small—a total of$25,909.53, of which $7,687.20 was spent on the site survey for Fort Leavenworth—the admission raises the concern that the Department of Defense violated the law by knowingly expending these funds while federal law enacted by Congress expressly prohibited the agency from doing so,” Schmidt informed lawmakers in the letter, a copy of which was obtained by the Free Beacon.

The administration’s behavior has raised concerns in Congress that it is secretly planning to relocate detainees to United States cities without informing local officials and residents.

Rep. Mike Pompeo (R., Kansas) told the Free Beacon that Americans should not have the most “hardened terrorists” secretly transferred to their towns by the Obama administration.

“Americans, and particularly Kansans, understand that President Obama’s desire to bring hardened terrorists from Guantanamo Bay to the U.S. would make our country less safe,” Pompeo said. “In completing these site surveys, the Department of Defense followed neither the letter, nor the spirit of American law. I am proud to stand with my colleagues in condemning this illegal action and encouraging all states to pursue appropriate legal action.”

Pompeo, along with fellow Kansas Republican Reps. Lynn Jenkins and Kevin Yoder, are demanding the Pentagon explain its intentions and why it violated U.S. law in its effort to bring Gitmo inmates to America, according to the Monday letter obtained by the Free Beacon.

“Rather than spending zero dollars on site surveys, as mandated by U.S. law, the Department of Defense has spent over $25,000,” the lawmakers wrote. “This is following neither the letter, nor the spirit of the law.”

The lawmakers seek to determine who in the Pentagon authorized the site surveys, when they took place, and how the taxpayer funds were spent, according to the inquiry. The letter also demanded the names of Obama administration officials and outside contractors who participated in the Gitmo relocation sites surveys.

“We stand with our Senate colleagues in condemning this illegal action and encouraging all states to pursue the appropriate legal action in response,” the lawmakers concluded.

Guantanamo Bay inmates who have been released continue to reengage in terrorism. At least two former inmates have participated in terror operations against U.S. forces since January.

The Obama administration continues to pursue an aggressive effort to free as many inmates as possible before leaving office.

This entry was posted in National Security and tagged Guantanamo. Bookmark the permalink.


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gitmo; obamagitmo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 10/03/2016 6:10:23 PM PDT by drewh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: drewh

Dear Congress, your horses have left the barn.


2 posted on 10/03/2016 6:12:28 PM PDT by Paladin2 (auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Impeachment Reason # 546.

“AT THIS POINT WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?”


3 posted on 10/03/2016 6:13:38 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Law shmaw, there are no laws for D.C. bureaucrats anymore.


4 posted on 10/03/2016 6:13:59 PM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

i think they are all at diego garcia by now, lol. especially with a cat 5 beahing down on them! Obozo probably game em a private jet...


5 posted on 10/03/2016 6:14:27 PM PDT by drewh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: drewh

“The Obama administration continues to pursue an aggressive effort to free as many inmates as possible before leaving office. “

Something to keep in mind and remember.


6 posted on 10/03/2016 6:14:37 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Has anyone found a city that will take him after next January?


7 posted on 10/03/2016 6:15:27 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (36 days: Until Presdient Pre-elect becomes President Elect Donald J. Trump. Help is on the way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Man from Bangladesh charged in plot to kill US military member for ISIS

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3476397/posts


8 posted on 10/03/2016 6:15:35 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

And tell me that Congress did not know about this. What is it with all these criminals?? Traitors protecting traitors. WTF???


9 posted on 10/03/2016 6:17:21 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Oh goodness gracious, they broke the law (again).

Quick somebody call the FBI!


10 posted on 10/03/2016 6:18:36 PM PDT by AC86UT89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

So what? Until these capons and geldings in congress grow a pair, nothing will be done except for Kabuki “hearings”. What a pathetic absence of Patriots who believe in the Rule of Law and the Constitution. These bums in congress should be ashamed of their impotence. They are flaccid.


11 posted on 10/03/2016 6:23:11 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pride in the USA

My senses are dull to non-existent to muster the energy to be shocked by anything they do. Worse, I know for a fact that there will be no consequences. Period.


12 posted on 10/03/2016 6:24:09 PM PDT by lonevoice (Life is short. Make fun of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

His presence in the White House violates the Constitution.


13 posted on 10/03/2016 6:25:53 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Either we have laws or we don’t.

Lately, we don’t.

Nothing will happen to the law breakers. There was no intent. It’s a tax. Etc


14 posted on 10/03/2016 6:26:42 PM PDT by Principled (...the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

Then they are succeeding.


15 posted on 10/03/2016 6:27:02 PM PDT by polymuser (Enough is enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Grrrrr. . .#@^&*%*^$@#$%^%&!


16 posted on 10/03/2016 6:27:40 PM PDT by Rodm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rodm

Impeach him after the election. The public doesn’t want to deal with it I’m afraid. Too lazy. Obama knows it.


17 posted on 10/03/2016 6:33:55 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Laws? We need no stinking laws!!! We are the elites, the invincibles, and if you oppose us, you are racist! This man has broken every law with impunity thanks to the feckless fools in the opposition party—the stupid and feckless Republican party. A feckless fool on the hill combined with Lyin’ Ryan and Mitch “Turtle Face” McDumbo; all around feckless bastards of the Uniparty. Shame on you Obozo, shame on you Lyin’ Ryan, Shame on on Tuttle Face McDumbo.


18 posted on 10/03/2016 6:35:03 PM PDT by Fungi (Beer, you like beer? Enjoy your beer and all the fungi that come with it,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

He can also move them far safety reasons. There’s a hurricane coming in.


19 posted on 10/03/2016 6:35:08 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: drewh

President Trump needs to make sure these terrorists and John Hinkley are permanently housed in buildings next door to the obamas permanent residence and all homes they use for vacations.


20 posted on 10/03/2016 6:35:18 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson