Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cen-Tejas
ANSWER: She doesn’t have pneumonia and if she doesn’t and that doctor did say she did (in writing) then she should have her license yanked.

To play Devil's Advocate (an appropriate name for my role here!): If Hillary was "diagnosed" on Friday, that may be based on a physical on Wednesday, with the x-ray read on Thursday. The tyrant-wannabe might have been on precautionary antibiotics since Wednesday, with a confirmation of bacterial pneumonia coming after the course of antibiotics was started. After four full days on antibiotics, Hillary would have posed no medical threat to her beloved granddaughter.

166 posted on 09/13/2016 2:59:45 PM PDT by Pollster1 (Somebody who agrees with me 80% of the time is a friend and ally, not a 20% traitor. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: Pollster1

.....my main point was “IF” she “DID NOT” have pneumonia, and the doctor said she “DID”..............., in order to provide her patient some FALSE cover in a presidential election, then she should lose her license.


169 posted on 09/13/2016 5:24:10 PM PDT by Cen-Tejas (it's the debt bomb stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson