I’m not talking about money. I’m talking about popularity and how ugly it would make the GOP in the hands of the media who would protect the liar and burn the accuser.
But tio show you how popular Clinton is, he made a total of $13,434,000 for his 54 speeches, which works out to an average of $248,777.78 per speech last year.
http://www.davemanuel.com/how-much-money-does-bill-clinton-make-from-giving-speeches-158/
And again, it isn’t worth it to get shanghaied by the media by going after him. Believe me, he did some things that he should be imprisoned for like the blood trade with Canada and the passing of the MRV missile tracking program that now has missiles on the blocks in China aimed at our left coast with multiple warheads aboard ready to go.
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/05/11/world/clinton-approves-technology-transfer-to-china.html
And the missile technology to accomplish it from Lockheed Martin.
http://fas.org/spp/starwars/crs/98-485.pdf
This guy is filthy. But his “posse, the media, will never let him get nailed.
red
You are making the same point I continuously make. The media is a *WEAPON* and they will use it against us because they have it and we don't.
The question is, why are we so stupid that most of us don't recognize the need to take that weapon away from them, and then turn it's power on them?
Why do we keep living in fear of their use of the weapon instead of recognizing that we should not tolerate their possession of that weapon?
This guy is filthy. But his “posse, the media, will never let him get nailed.
Which once again begs for the question, "Why do we tolerate this media weapon remaining in the hands of our enemies?"