Posted on 08/15/2016 6:55:41 AM PDT by HomerBohn
Former United States Attorney General Michael Mukasey tells MSNBC that not only is Hillary Clinton’s private email server illegal, it "disqualifies" her from holding any federal office. Such as, say, President of the United States. Very specifically it points to one federal law, Title 18. Section 2071.
For those of us who do not have United States Code committed to memory, here’s what it says:
“(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.”
Word for word from the Cornell Law Library!
Yes, it explicitly states “….shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.”
Can it be any clearer???!!!
This criminal has got to be charged, tried and jailed. Her occasional husband figure and all her lieutenants have to go with her.
Take a look at Drudge...
They do whatever they want. No rules. No overseers. Obama has established a pattern and they are clearly sticking to the script.
Did you kiss Comey saying they don’t recommend prosecution?
No trial. No conviction. She can do what she wants
This is a non starter
She did not “intend” to break the law, so it was not willingly or unlawfully ...
Now, if we were a nation of laws, she would have been convicted and sentenced by now and those paragraphs would indeed apply. Alas, some are more equal than others ....
Uh huh... Are these similar to the laws she already violated with impunity? Don’t hold your breathe waiting for this one...
But only if the DOJ okay’s it?
We wish....
I did and I do. Several times a day. The only story I saw was about Hillary copying Donald’s hairdo.
Right.
Madrid 1936.
We don’t get no satisfaction!!!!!!
Entire government is the personification of corruption.
It is clear, and clearly unconstitutional.
Trump should cite that rule at the debates.
I believe that so was obama, but look where the son of a bitch is now.
Nothing is going to happen to Hillary.
Yes, it explicitly states
That depends on what the definition of “it” is....
Seems like James Comey and/or Loretta Lynch would have access to the code you posted.
“She did not “intend” to break the law, so it was not willingly or unlawfully.”
So she says and Comey. If she did not know it was illegal, she does not have the intellect to be president, does not have the temperament to be president, is unfit for presidential office.
You betcha! He should call a press conference of ONLY the few Conservative outlets and lay this on them! The entire central socialist government is corrupt! In fact, in its present state, it’s corrupted beyond repair!
Need a new slimline government with a businessman at its head.
They are selective readers.
bttt
AND THE FBI “INTENT” REASONING IS AN ADDITION TO, NOT THE ONLY ... CITATION !
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.