[trebb]

imho this is stupid, and it's why I disagree w/ folks who like T's offering twice as much.

Trump's offering is predicated on revising the tax structure and spending money where it is intended to be spent, efficiently and within budget. Hillary's plan is to do what Obama did - tax more business types and divert the money to slush funds.

How can you disagree with the folks who prefer Trump's offering?

[citizen]

How can you disagree with the folks who prefer Trump's offering?

How indeed? There's nothing wrong with infrastructure spending if it's properly and efficiently administered.
It is also necessary to even maintain a given level of prosperity, much less increase it.

[expat_panama]

Tx for your explanation that you see it as "predicated on revising the tax structure and spending money where it is intended to be spent, efficiently and within budget"  and that pretty much matches up w/ our thread last week --Trump Just Promised To Double Down On Obama's Failed Stimulus.

While political ardor is all well and good for the faithful, Trump's half $T for roads'n'bridges will have to come out of this:

--and so far all I'm getting is that he's planning on increasing spending big time while his 'cuts' won't even hold a candle to the annual 10 baseline budget hike.