“You wanted a candidate that will stand up and fight the decline of this country, and when that candidate stands up and fights, you sit at your keyboard and question his strategy like a coward?
YOU. MAKE. ME. SICK!
“
Oh settle down, emotional twit.
A candidate that stands up and fights isnt any damn good when the fire isnt going at Hillary, but at some utterly forgettable characters that aren’t running for anything.
Now tell us, hothead, how much damage has this done to Hillary?
Not your BS made up assumption, but REALITY.
100 days until the election is not the time to be wasting days on this, no matter how awesome you think it is.
Good point. It has done nothing but help her as it takes the focus off the email scandal, her horrible convention speech, the fact that she has no accomplishments, her responsibility for Benghazi, her proposed tax increases, her desire to never protect our borders, and to bring in as many Muslim radicals into this country as possible. Good thing we're talking about a nobody like Khan instead of Hillary.
How is he supposed to damage Hillary when anytime he says anything his own party grabs his fist and hits him in the face with it?
What the Hell is the point of standing up for people like you?
Not only can you not stand up for yourself, you can’t let anyone stand up for you either, and when someone does, you attack them.
You deserve to lose, loser.
We won't know the answer because events didn't play out this way, but how much damage would have been done to Trump if the assertions of Khan the father were allowed to stand without being disputed?
If somebody other than Hillary makes a widely publicized false claim about Trump, he should pretend it didn't happen? If asked about it, he should say, what?