Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans, No More: Sir Thomas wouldn't fit in today's GOP
The Shinbone: The Frontier of the Free Press ^ | July 31, 2016 | Daniel Clark

Posted on 07/31/2016 5:13:58 PM PDT by Daniel Clark

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: ThomasMore
Ping !

Leni

21 posted on 07/31/2016 7:46:37 PM PDT by MinuteGal (Trump, White House.....Hillary, Jail House.....Bernie, Nut House.....Obama, Outhouse !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel Clark

Yes, Christie’s a whore. And maybe there’s a lesson for so many in that realization. But Trump’s shortcomings pale in comparison to what our only other alternative is, given the current state of affairs.

BTW, you really like the word “splenetic”, don’t you?


22 posted on 07/31/2016 7:57:20 PM PDT by workerbee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel Clark

Has Christie gone AWOL in the battle against Hillary and her American killing policies? No. Given that, Chris Christie is far more “conservative” than the junior Senator from Texas. “True conservatives” do not cut and run with Americans dead in the street by the dozens. Self interested careerists do. Ted Cruz is dead to me.


23 posted on 07/31/2016 8:02:53 PM PDT by lodi90 (Clear choice for Conservatives now: TRUMP or lose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel Clark; Tax-chick
Your attitude is assinine, your points are far and few between, your writing lurches from one poorly-thought premise to the next unsupported one, and your even your proofreading sucks.

Mind you, it was Christie, after Hurricane Sandy in 2012, who couldn’t keep is hands of President Obama

May your tenure here be mercifully short.

24 posted on 07/31/2016 8:06:52 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Muslims kill people because they're sick of being called violent! They're violent over Islamophobia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

And a horrid one, at that.


25 posted on 07/31/2016 8:08:13 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Muslims kill people because they're sick of being called violent! They're violent over Islamophobia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Indeed


26 posted on 07/31/2016 8:25:57 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel

“Anyone who’s read Utopia will know that Thomas More was a socialist at heart ...”

Author Daniel Clark may have done more harm than good, by citing the case of Thomas More, as some sort of dippy moral comeuppance directed at the modern Republican party.

Forum members had better stop believing they know the real Thomas More from seeing Robert Bolt’s compelling play, “A Man for all Seasons.”

“Socialist at heart” is the least criticism that might be leveled against the real, historically documented Thomas More. He certainly wasn’t a man of fastidious morals, devoted to following some species of worthy dictates of his own conscience, in preference to some random collection of allegedly improper or morally suspect directives from the English crown.

He was a raging religious fanatic who spent his spare time dreaming up new ways to torture “heretics” - those not totally devoted to his totalitarian brand of pre-modern Catholic-church power politics. He violated every oath of secular office and of personal fealty he may have sworn to the English crown (to say nothing about loyalty to nation or familial interest), in pursuit of the corrupt, thoroughly temporal/secular, and ruinously sneaky aims of the Papacy of his day (Italian, hopelessly entwined with then-rising imperial Spain).

More’s own wife described him as loopy (in pre-Elizabethan terms). He wasn’t canonized until the 1930s; that the Church had to think it over for so many centuries is not exactly a vote of confidence for the man, or his deeds.


27 posted on 07/31/2016 9:21:29 PM PDT by schurmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Well said!


28 posted on 08/01/2016 3:01:05 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("How sad for civilization." ~ hal ogen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Daniel Clark
Nice try - Cruz showed us that we dodged a bullet when he got trounced by the guy who, "couldn't run a lemonade stand, much less a campaign"...

Cruz started his presidential run resume` in college (probably before) and felt every bit as entitled as Hillary does. His "exuberance" has peeled away his facade and explained why he always seems to be lecturing instead of talking - he feels superior in the same way that Obama does.

29 posted on 08/01/2016 4:28:26 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson