Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WikiLeaks founder says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hillary [tr]
Silence is Consent ^ | July 22 2016 | Steve Boss

Posted on 07/22/2016 10:20:51 PM PDT by proust

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 last
To: Kenny

Many individuals through the years have assured us they have the goods on Hillary and their next revelation will guarantee her arrest. Some of those people are no longer breathing.


161 posted on 07/24/2016 8:06:14 AM PDT by Deo volente (The islamists want to eradicate us, and will never stop. We need to eradicate them first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: proust

This is Putin’s play.


162 posted on 07/24/2016 8:26:04 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (This posting is a microaggression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

This one came out in the 50s.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8e3yM8KV_I


163 posted on 07/24/2016 10:16:22 AM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: proust

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hillary Clinton.

Sure it will... and snake oil will cure whatever ails ya. Lotta this kind of thing going around the net, and it's just not the kind of thing I'd want to take to the bank.

164 posted on 07/24/2016 12:05:16 PM PDT by Kenton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing
"NOTHING could indict Hillary. NOTHING,..."

That is right. WIKI Leaks will release what? Documents showing she is corrupt? Documents showing she is a liar? Documents showing she is a thief? Did Captain Obvious himslef leak this upcoming release? The democrats and republicans know what and what she is, and democrats love her for it. This DOJ will not touch her, and the media will barely cover it.

165 posted on 07/24/2016 12:45:36 PM PDT by GregoTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9

“This one came out in the 50s.”

That’s the one I played.


166 posted on 07/24/2016 1:28:46 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra (Don't touch that thing Don't let anybody touch that thing!I'm a Doctor and I won't touch that thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

http://www.defenseone.com/technology/2016/07/how-putin-weaponized-wikileaks-influence-election-american-president/130163/

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/25/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-emails.html


167 posted on 07/25/2016 4:53:09 AM PDT by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: proust
To put it bluntly, there is no way in HELL that the Obama In-Justice Department will EVER indict Hillary Clinton, no matter how overwhelming the evidence is.

That's already been proven.

I'll even say that there's no way a Trump Justice Department will do it either. One President allowing a former President to be indicted for crimes against America?

Never happen. Period. I damn' sure wish it would, but it won't.

168 posted on 07/25/2016 5:56:12 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SisterK

Think foreign indictments from nations that extradite for criminal activities carried out on foreign soil. Her crimes are international in scope. She cannot be presidentress if she cannot travel to Europe, the Middle East, the Far East and other locations without threat of arrest for active indictments in those regions.


169 posted on 07/25/2016 6:17:32 PM PDT by MIA_eccl1212 (10 rounds 10 meters 10 seconds 10 centimetres)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: MIA_eccl1212

What a hopeful point.
We know that at least Egypt hates her.
Unfortunately leadership in more than a few countries is just as morally broken as here.
It would be a hoot if she was arrested overseas.
And had to finish life in a third world prison.
Comey cannot protect her on someone else’s turf.


170 posted on 07/25/2016 8:04:15 PM PDT by SisterK (its a spiritual war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: proust
One of these is not like the other.

"WikiLeaks founder says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hillary"

"While Assange didn’t specify what exactly was in the emails, he did tell ITV that WikiLeaks had “accumulated a lot of material about Hillary Clinton, which could proceed to an indictment.” "Assange said the whistleblowing website will soon be leaking documents that will provide “enough evidence” for the Department of Justice to indict the presumptive Democratic nominee."

Obama's Just Us Department? Well, maybe not. Quoting Assange, “[Attorney General Loretta Lynch] is not going to indict Hillary Clinton. It’s not possible that could happen."

OK, that's a complete contradiction of the title of the article, isn't it? Making me wonder if the title was just click-bait.

171 posted on 07/26/2016 8:53:30 AM PDT by Kenton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson