like shooting fish in pail...
1 posted on
07/17/2016 10:39:38 AM PDT by
Nachum
To: Nachum
In either case 200,000 troops would not be enough. Unless we are willing to send them in their with no restrictions on their ROE (Rules of Engagement) I wouldn’t send a single soldier.
To: Nachum
Truly, he’s way over his head!
3 posted on
07/17/2016 10:43:48 AM PDT by
SIRTRIS
To: Nachum
5 posted on
07/17/2016 10:55:10 AM PDT by
4Liberty
(We SEE Trump tossed every contrived hurdle. Hillary given every absurd mulligan.THAT'S WHY-GO TRUMP!)
To: Nachum
560 troops. Wow, that’s just major. Really, it is the epitome of impotence.
6 posted on
07/17/2016 10:59:31 AM PDT by
Crucial
To: Nachum
First, on July 6, President Barack Obama announced he would keep 8,400 troops in Afghanistan past the end of his presidency. Just told a friend of mine two days ago that he would do that. Jugears is so predictably full of crap.
9 posted on
07/17/2016 11:27:54 AM PDT by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
To: Nachum
Telegraphs or telling how many troops we have anywhere is treasonous, but is Obama’s standard MO.
10 posted on
07/17/2016 11:37:44 AM PDT by
CincyRichieRich
(Who is John Galt? ...Also and more importantly, Isaiah 59: 4, 6, 9, 15, 16.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
