To: SteveH
“The plainclothes officers said they did not intervene for fear their own safety would be jeopardized as the estimated 400 protesters developed a ‘mob mentality.’”
Cowards. If I were one of the victims I would sue that police department.
To: forgotten man
SCOTUS has already ruled that police have no duty to protect the individual.
21 posted on
06/08/2016 7:20:07 PM PDT by
Eagles6
( Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
To: forgotten man
Did they have guns? Just one real gun would have frightened the thugs into running in the opposite direction. The bullies are cowards.
22 posted on
06/08/2016 7:20:29 PM PDT by
mia
To: forgotten man
Two against 400? Get real.
34 posted on
06/08/2016 7:48:37 PM PDT by
Beowulf9
To: forgotten man
"When there's an assault on a police officer, we don't have any tolerance for that," prosecutor Chris Boscia said.
39 posted on
06/08/2016 8:15:59 PM PDT by
heartwood
(If you're looking for a </sarc tag>, you just saw it.)
To: forgotten man
Look up legal police duty to rescue. There is only a duty in 2 or 3 states and CA isn’t one of them. LEO are under no obligation to save anyone and if they claim it was not safe to help someone they are off the hook in every state.
56 posted on
06/08/2016 9:11:36 PM PDT by
Tammy8
(Please be a regular supporter of Free Republic !)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson