Clinton’s warnings about Trump actually describe…her

The New York Post ^ | 2 Jun 16 | Post Editorial Board

[seanmerc]

That was a “major national-security address”?

Hillary Clinton’s folks billed her San Diego speech Thursday as a big deal. And it certainly was a prime opportunity to lay out her views on foreign policy and America’s role in the world.

But what she delivered was a 45-minute rant against Donald Trump — with nary a clue about her plans for leading America on the international stage.

Worse, her string of dump-on-Trump quips might’ve worked better if she had substituted her name for his, starting with her attack on Trump’s “series of rants” — a perfect description of her own speech.

Clinton tried to portray Trump as “dangerous.” But what do you call it when a secretary of state, to shield herself from accountability, stores classified emails (some beyond “top secret”) on her private, unsecured server, leaving them vulnerable to hackers the world over?

[Red Badger]

But what do you call it when a secretary of state, to shield herself from accountability, stores classified emails (some beyond “top secret”) on her private, unsecured server, leaving them vulnerable to hackers the world over?

TREASON..................................

[TexasFreeper2009]

An OLD trick used by the left for as long as I can remember.

Accuse your enemy of what you are actually guilty of.

[Elsie]

... with nary a clue about her plans for leading America on the international stage.

We don't need clues.

By golly; if Hillary says she's gots plans; shes GOTS them!

[T-Bone Texan]

It is widely accepted as conventional wisdom that she used the server to sell state secrets of foreign entities.

[NorthMountain]

But what do you call it when a secretary of state, to shield herself from accountability, stores classified emails (some beyond “top secret”) on her private, unsecured server, leaving them vulnerable to hackers the world over?

Multiple violations of the espionage act, for which she should be prosecuted.

[Vinnie]

An OLD trick used by the left for as long as I can remember.

Exactly.

Another axiom ..
Take the name of any legislative bill and the actual intention and outcome will be opposite, 180º of the name.
Examples..
freedom= oppression,
more= less, less= more,
cheaper= more expensive,
savings= wasteful.

[rockinqsranch]

Right on the mark to you both.

[Cubs Fan]

She didn’t even care enough about America to keep classified info out of our enemies’ hands. SHE is unfit to serve.

[dfwgator]

Liberals always self-project.