Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: StAnDeliver

Kasich wouldn’t be bad, I just don’t think he’ll do it. All the conventional wisdom has been against Trump, and there is no audience that has the willies worse than the sorts of political insiders he will need to tap. He needs someone willing to take the risk, and I don’t see that in Kasich.

Newt knows what’s going on and is champing at the bit to go.

Coats is very able and if I’m right (which I’ve no reasonable expectation of being, really), he’s had enough of the Bush doctrine and might take the risk because he might not give a crap about threats being issued not to give aid and comfort to the Donald.


310 posted on 05/17/2016 5:34:30 PM PDT by BlackAdderess (A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen... -Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]


To: BlackAdderess
Kasich wouldn’t be bad,

Worse choice ever.

312 posted on 05/17/2016 5:42:09 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson