Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

Bill Clinton was president in the 1990’s. Trump was parroting every position that the Clinton’s had back then including support for partial birth abortion and universal single payer health care like they have in Scotland.

Trump was old enough to know better. If Trump were 21 to 25 when he had those positions, I can understand his so called change of heart. But he was in his 50’s when he had these positions and frankly he didn’t start extolling his conservative credentials until he was actually running for president.

So yes, his past statements are fair game. To call someone a liar because they point out these inconsistencies and lifelong positions on the basis that he claims he doesn’t hold those positions anymore is dishonest.

I don’t think you will find any other candidate in the Republican field that supported partial birth abortion, universal healthcare, contributed to Pelosi, Reid, Schumer and who claims to be a Great Christian but never ever repented of any of his sins.

I frankly don’t understand how any Christian could support him. But that’s just me.


97 posted on 04/11/2016 6:29:27 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe; wagglebee

They all support partial birth abortion, PM, as a result of no consequence abortion. They have made no statements about which month of gestation the woman suddenly starts being guilty for arranging the death of her child. They just issued a blanket statement that she is not accountable; that she’s being used; that she is innocent I heard from one corner.

So, I’m simply not moved by that argument at all. AND, this no consequence position goes far back in time. We were duped all along.

Nonetheless, I am willing to hold any candidate to anything he or she has said only in the last 2 years or so.

That makes all of the candidates liable for their recent record, and it seems more than fair to me.

We start with all of them being pro-abortion. I checked even with the Constitution Party and they DO NOT have a statement condemning no consequence abortion.

So, we have no party, we have no home.

We are strangers and pilgrims in this land seeking a better city.


100 posted on 04/12/2016 6:12:49 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson