Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homosexuals threaten to burn down Christian bakers’ house and sodomize their son
Fellowship Of The Minds ^ | 4/3/2016 | Dr. Eowyn

Posted on 04/04/2016 3:09:38 PM PDT by HomerBohn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: HomerBohn

r u kidding ?
deer rifles


41 posted on 04/04/2016 4:09:25 PM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

This nation is more and more like Sodom and Gomorrah each day. I say no more. Stop this insane nonsense now.


42 posted on 04/04/2016 4:10:05 PM PDT by Lumper20 (Lyin Ted lies more then Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Wouldn’t it be nice if some of those “foreign” license plated cars wound up with tires slashed! The imported crud might learn to stay home.


43 posted on 04/04/2016 4:15:29 PM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

That weapon is downright Art ... I Like!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3417470/posts


44 posted on 04/04/2016 4:27:40 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (Idiocracy used to just be a Movie... Live every day as your last...one day you will be right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: exit82

Big Homo isn’t quite that big.


45 posted on 04/04/2016 4:32:45 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
Bake the cake. With a few doses of Ex Lax thrown in for consistency. See how they like that sh!t.

No, they'd get sued and possibly imprisoned for putting a dangerous substance in the food.

But they could just bake the perverts a real bad tasting cake with non-dangerous ingredients. "Gee, we're real sorry you didn't like the way our cake tasted"... we did our best." (snicker)

46 posted on 04/04/2016 4:39:30 PM PDT by driftless2 (For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Genesis 19:5
Pulpit Commentary

Verse 5. - And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? Josephus supposes them to have been of beautiful countenances (’Ant.,’ 1:11, 3), which excited the lust of the Sodomites, and caused them to assault Lot’s house with shameful cries. Bring them out unto us, that we may know them. The sin here euphemistically referred to (cf. Judges 19:22) was exceedingly prevalent among the Canaanites (Leviticus 18:22) and other heathen nations (Romans 1:27). Under the law of Moses it was punishable by death.

Genesis 19:5 Additional Commentaries
Context
Lot Welcomes the Angels
…4 Before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, surrounded the house, both young and old, all the people from every quarter; 5 and they called to Lot and said to him, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may have relations with them.” 6 But Lot went out to them at the doorway, and shut the door behind him,…


47 posted on 04/04/2016 4:39:52 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's fonding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

ANOTHER one? Have to wonder if queers are just “testing” places trying desperately to find something to scream victimhood about.


48 posted on 04/04/2016 4:43:48 PM PDT by jughandle (Big words anger me, keep talking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

But that argument doesn’t win.

Should a black printer have to print flyers for a KKK rally?
Should a Jewish baker be required to make a cake honoring Hitler or bearing a swastika?
....etc....

This is a free speech issue, coerced or compelled speech. Such arguments have existing precedent.

Will you make me a birthday cake? yes
Will you sell me the cake on the shelf? yes
Will you make me a gay wedding cake? no, FREE SPEECH

It is not discrimination against the persons, it is against the EVENT. If you’re compelled to put time/money/energy toward an EVENT you disagree with it is anti-free speech. If we keep making it a religious liberty issue we’ll lose. They’ll just argue, “of course you have religious liberty but not when you discriminate against others”. So we must make the case that it is free speech, not religious liberty at stake.


49 posted on 04/04/2016 5:07:20 PM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Realizing that we all have differing opinions, if a gay couple goes to a baker requesting a cake for a gay wedding and the baker explains their religious beliefs which prevents them from baking the cake, the gays should be tolerant, understand the beliefs of the baker, and seek a baker who is on their team. Done.


50 posted on 04/04/2016 5:56:56 PM PDT by From The Deer Stand (Alka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: From The Deer Stand

**** “Realizing that we all have differing opinions, if a gay couple goes to a baker requesting a cake for a gay wedding and the baker explains their religious beliefs which prevents them from baking the cake, the gays should be tolerant, understand the beliefs of the baker, and seek a baker who is on their team. Done.” *****

Just tell them that the Bakery is too busy ... They surely must have Competition, just give them a reference to a Competitor.
Done


51 posted on 04/04/2016 6:33:28 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (Idiocracy used to just be a Movie... Live every day as your last...one day you will be right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Militant fags in East Texas. The infection has spread throughout the body.


52 posted on 04/04/2016 6:38:36 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: From The Deer Stand

There can no longer be civil disagreement.
To the Left it is:
“You disagree with me, therefore
I must hate you
I must destroy you
I must kill you.”
It is all about in your face control and tyranny, to the point of violence.
That is why I believe that we are going into the hot phase of CWII soon. The Left will continue to escalate, and it will be the Left that will fire the first round. Then all bets are off.
I will have no sympathy for any SJW who will become a casualty.


53 posted on 04/04/2016 7:28:30 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn; All

FRC PRAISES CRUZ DE-REG PLANS TAKING GOVERNMENT OUT OF RELIGION
America’s Christian bakers and florists and wedding planners will be safe under a Ted Cruz presidency. “I am absolutely convinced in my discussions with the senator that religious liberty will be a lot better off in America with a Cruz administration,” Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council and Chair of Cruz’s Religious Liberty Advisory Council emphsized when endorsing Cruz.These are the policies that he is going to pursue,” Perkins announced. “He is absolutely committed to the issue of religious liberty.”

The council was calling on Cruz to direct a review of the IRS’ treatment of religious organizations and to direct federal agencies to respect the free exercise of religion. Cruz said he will Defend and protect small business owners facing assault for refusing to violate their religious beliefs.

If elected Cruz pledged he will Rescind Executive Order 13672 – an order that requires certain federal contractors to not discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity; - Direct all federal agencies to stop interpreting “sex” to include “sexual orientation” and/or “gender identity.” - Direct the Department of Health and Human Services to eliminate its requirement that all employers include coverage for all FDA-approved contraceptive methods and sterilization procedures;.

“As president, I have pledged on my first day in office to rescind every single one of President Obama’s unconstitutional executive actions, and to direct every federal agency to respect and protect the religious liberty of every American,” Cruz emphasized.


54 posted on 04/04/2016 7:33:38 PM PDT by mosesdapoet (My best insights get lost in FR's becaus e of meaningless venting no one reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fuzzylogic
Will you make me a birthday cake? yes Will you sell me the cake on the shelf? yes Will you make me a gay wedding cake? no, FREE SPEECH It is not discrimination against the persons, it is against the EVENT. If you’re compelled to put time/money/energy toward an EVENT you disagree with it is anti-free speech. If we keep making it a religious liberty issue we’ll lose. They’ll just argue, “of course you have religious liberty but not when you discriminate against others”. So we must make the case that it is free speech, not religious liberty at stake.

You can no more penalize a baker refusing to make a special creation that promotes something that is against his/her convictions than you can penalize a black sign maker for refusing to make a sign for a KKK celebration.

55 posted on 04/04/2016 8:04:29 PM PDT by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Junk Silver

LOL. Well put.


56 posted on 04/04/2016 8:09:00 PM PDT by Jack Hammer (uff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

For uppity perverts who threaten to sexually attack the bakers’ son, I say bring back Vlad the impaler. “Sicko on a sticko” should be a public spectacle of people who would threaten a child.


57 posted on 04/04/2016 8:13:13 PM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn
Homosexuals threaten to burn down Christian bakers’ house and sodomize their son

Well, that confirms my long held position, defining queers as:

Disease-ridden, boy-raping whackjobs.

58 posted on 04/04/2016 8:23:31 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Ohhh....Derka derka derka!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fuzzylogic

“It is not discrimination against the persons, it is against the EVENT.”

Exactly what I’ve been saying. A business person has every right to refuse to sponsor, condone, or participate in an EVENT that goes against his conscience—and be allowed to run the type of business he wants.
Should a country western bar be forced to host a rap concert?
Should a hotelier be forced to allow prostitution on the premises?
Should any business be forced to be a sponsor of a gay pride parade?


59 posted on 04/04/2016 8:46:03 PM PDT by mumblypeg (Reality is way more complicated than the internet. That's why I'm here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

there will be a terrible backlash....once we’re taken over by China or Russia or the muzzies, the homos will rue the day they went after the only people that would love them...the Christians....


60 posted on 04/04/2016 9:53:37 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson