Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jury Acquits Woman Arrested for Protecting Her Dog From a Cop
Reason ^ | Mar. 8, 2016 12:42 pm | Jacob Sullum

Posted on 03/10/2016 11:18:52 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 last
To: Dr. Sivana

I go nowhere without my GoPro AND Dashcam(and trusty little Ruger LCR .357)


101 posted on 03/10/2016 3:41:36 PM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Mears

How many turds in your punch bowl before it’s a problem?


102 posted on 03/10/2016 3:55:16 PM PST by muir_redwoods (Freedom isn't free, liberty isn't liberal and you'll never find anything Right on the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude

“I was talking about the cops personal dog, not his working dog. After consideration I am withdrawing my proposal. The cop’s dog did nothing wrong and should not be killed, however the cop needs to be pretty severely punished for killing someone’s pet needlessly.”

It’s always the same when cops break the law. It’s the old “the best defense is a good offense” crap. And sadly, they enlist the assistance of the DA and when needed, a judge, to get away with abuse under color of authority. What needs to happen here is the cop needs to be sued civily and criminally, and they need to go after the cop’s training officer and his chief.


103 posted on 03/10/2016 4:05:37 PM PST by vette6387 (Obama can go to hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

“If you watch it, the dog was perfectly calm, wagging his tail at the officer who, weirdly, had his gun trained on the nice-looking pet remorselessly.”

Sounds like he’s a sociopath.


104 posted on 03/10/2016 4:38:07 PM PST by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

“What needs to happen here is the cop needs to be sued civily and criminally, ...”

The problem with that is dogs are simply treated as property in civil and criminal matters with little or no regard to the emotional attachment. The value of the dog will probably be set in the hundreds of dollars and shooting it will probably be a misdemeanor destruction of property charge.


105 posted on 03/10/2016 6:17:42 PM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (It's the apocalypse, lets have some fun!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude
“The problem with that is dogs are simply treated as property in civil and criminal matters with little or no regard to the emotional attachment. The value of the dog will probably be set in the hundreds of dollars and shooting it will probably be a misdemeanor destruction of property charge.”

I am a dog owner and lover. Next to my family, my dog is most precious! There are no words I might use here, that would adequately express my love and devotion to my dog. So I don't know how to otherwise approach the vile acts of miscreant members of law enforcement when the cavalierly kill someones beloved pet who means them no harm. just because they've been “trained” that killing them is somehow a “lawful act.” To that end, the public needs to demand that law enforcement be respectful of these animal's lives and only be allowed the use of deadly force when they are actually threatened with bodily harm, just like they have to do with human beings. I can tell you this, I have actually had a substantive conversation with police officers in my community about my expectations with respect to the lives of our pets. I have actuallly raised directly the issue and have received assurances from the men who patrol our community that they do indeed respect our animals. Thankfully, there has been none of the kind of wanton disregard for animal life that occurred in this article in our community. I guess we are lucky where I live that our LEO's are cut above the norm.

106 posted on 03/10/2016 7:13:23 PM PST by vette6387 (Obama can go to hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude
The problem with that is dogs are simply treated as property in civil and criminal matters with little or no regard to the emotional attachment. The value of the dog will probably be set in the hundreds of dollars and shooting it will probably be a misdemeanor destruction of property charge.

The best bet would be to sue the officer under a Federal Civil Rights Claim for deprivation of property under color of law. That might allow punitives regardless of the "value" of the dog.

107 posted on 03/11/2016 8:16:23 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines (Obama loves America the way OJ loved Nicole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson