Ah yes ... NY Times! Lol!
The NY Times is full of homosexual liars.
But just look at what you are engaging ...
1. You are using the NY Times
2. You are using an unverified statement that in effect Trump wants no part of the Reform Party which includes David Duke elements (whether known by name or not)
3. You are attempting to contradict Trump’s statement of 2016 based on a report by a heavily discredited media source from 2000 and by inference a support for white supremacy by omission.
The above string of expressions is nonsensical.
It is nonsense because it tries to infer that Donald Trump did not embrace white supremacy in 2000 but now embraces it in 2016. That is false on its face and embarrassing to witness.
It is false because Donald Trump’s hundreds of businesses show unequivocally a practice of merit-based promotion without regard to race or gender.
It is embarrassing to witness because it comes from a minimal skillset of keyboards and internet search without an attending skill to discern veracity or sufficient completeness of factfinding. It’s worse than amateur, it’s hackish and deceitful.
You would do well to withhold your impulse to engage your keyboard than to reveal your embrace of patent nonsense. The anecdote of ‘Mark Twain and Fools’ applies here.
LOL all you want, but that New York Times interview was just used by Fox news a few minutes ago to contradict him. So, you better get used to hearing about it.