Skip to comments.Sarah Palin's PAC spent $1.4 million in 2015, gave just $23,500 to campaigns
Posted on 02/04/2016 4:26:07 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
Ex-Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin launched her political action fund, Sarah PAC, in 2009 with the stated purpose "to help elect principled conservative leaders" across the country. But the latest Federal Election Commission filing indicates that money raised in small contributions by Sarah PAC is going to consultants, speech-writing services, direct-mail appeals, as well as stays by Palin in fancy hotels.
Sarah PAC raised $950,000 in 2015, spent a total of $1.4 million, and donated just 23,500 to 45 campaigns. It also...
(Excerpt) Read more at m.seattlepi.com ...
Usually that is a sign of a severe character deficit, or long term substance abuse.
Donât serve Saint Teddy Cruz and you get destroyed.
...nappy, you are a dishonest troll... exactly how is the endorser of Trumpet spending the whole PAC bundle at all related to the Senator from Texas. See if you can stoop lower like your idol... go hang at DU for and raise the IQ of FR!
Ooops....that’s going to hurt.
Buzz off. I have been here much longer then you. You have a long way to go before you tell me anything. Go away.
s/b I've always viewed Sarah PAC as...
Well, I have just marked her off my list of respected republicans.
Go look in the mirror.
Good ole Ellie Mae. The crony capitalist queen.
“Sarah PAC raised $950,000 in 2015, spent a total of $1.4 million, and donated just 23,500 to 45 campaigns”
That is pretty pathetic. I never would have expected this from Governor Palin.
This is illegal. I demand an investigation. That is tax fraud.
The stated purpose is to get conservatives elected. C’mon, just 23 grand to candidates, really?
I don’t believe I was speaking to you.
Haha, was Bristol a paid consultant??
Sarah is a big con man than Trump.
Yep...Trump was the highest bidder. What’s a girl to do?
Big slush fund to pay for travel and hotels.
The Clinton Initiative gives more to their cause than old slippery Sarah.
PT Barnum was right.......
Isn’t the point of a PAC to spend money on a candidates behalf since there are limits to what can be given directly? This is stupid.
No surprise here.
Correct and Sarah’s PAC has been discussed in the past years about this very
topic on FR. But most PACS are in the same mode I suspect. A good way
to cover a lot of activities using donated money.
I care. The article says she did the same thing in 2014 and I have donated to this PAC a few times.
So? What's your point? Enhancing your liberal credentials?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.