Right wing usually refers to the understanding that a healthy society goes by a number of rules, whether codified in law or not, and whether democratically popular or not. For example, no amount of voting and legislating can redefine moral sexual behavior, or abolish private property, or muzzle the voice of established religion.
Monarchism really comes in two flavors: in a country that has a legitimate monarch (like for example, in France) that would be support of him or her, and generally the support of the institutions of the crown. In a country like ours where there is no legitimate monarch, monarchists simply point out that eventually, over great length of time perhaps, we as a nation shall produce monarchic institutions alongside our democratic institutions; no American monarchist that I know of calls for a royalist revolution.
Paleolibertarianism is a form of libertarianism that conforms with the original Austrian school of economics, and values individual rights over the needs and desires of a government. It is, however, also in opposition to moral libertinism that also calls itself libertarianism.
Nationalism is the understanding that a healthy society is a national society, where the institutions have a distinctly national character; where national cohesion exists in the culture and possibly also in the laws. More specifically, the problem of public square: real estate not owned privately, — should be resolved in the sense that it is an asset that belongs to the nation and not automatically available to anyone wishing to express himself.
Of course we should arm the Irish. Also the English, the Germans, the French and ourselves. We don’t have governments that would protect us any more.
Thank you for the detailed response. You’re a scholar and a gentleman.