To: DoughtyOne
So one, he was either helping him form his policies, or two he was simply willing to go along to get along.
If I need to spell it out for you, thatâs a RINO.
It doesnât bother you a bit that these two were talking up policies that denied Stateâs Rights. LOL
You still don't understand what being a Lawyer is all about, do you?
You simply want to assume because Ted wrote this up for Bush that he agreed with it because it helps you to ignore the failings of Trump, even on this same issue.
You don't know if Ted held these positions. You don't know if, as an advisor, Ted argued against these positions. All you know is he wrote up a position paper that REFLECTED GWB's positions on the issues.
But the possibility of Ted taking these positions is enough for you.
Like most charges by Trump Fan-bois, it is lacking in proof and attempt dots that just don't exist to come to a conclusion that is nothing more than a jaded opinion by a completely biased supporter of another candidate.
75 posted on
01/30/2016 12:03:38 AM PST by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
Look, if you want to think that Ted was just taking dictation and typing this all up for Bush, go ahead.
He wasn’t Susie Que secretary.
His title was Policy Adviser to Presidential Candidate George W. Bush, on immigration matters.
You certainly can’t accept the situation can you.
It’s your take that Ted with his top level Constitutional Law degree, was simply Bush’s secretary.
LOL
78 posted on
01/30/2016 12:06:55 AM PST by
DoughtyOne
(Free Republic Caucus: vote daily / watch for the thread / Starts 01/20 midnight to midnight EST)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson