Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JoSixChip
Of course you do know that Cruz supports eminent domain also.

Cruz does not support the use of eminent domain to take private property from one private party in order to give it to another private party - but then you know that. Cruz does support eminent domain as defined in the Constitution - to be taken with just compensation for PUBLIC USE. At this point, I'm not even sure Trump can spell Constitution...

94 posted on 01/23/2016 10:55:10 PM PST by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: CA Conservative
Cruz does not support the use of eminent domain to take private property from one private party in order to give it to another private party

Do you have a source for that? At any rate, this issue is way down on my list of priorities and well below trowing career GOP politicians out on their asses. Especially the ones owing their allegiance to goldman sachs and the CFG.
101 posted on 01/23/2016 11:01:46 PM PST by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - losers are not winners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson