Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: usafa92
Interesting that your entire post avoids completely any mention of the actual topic at hand -- that Trump called for INCREASING ethanol by decree of the FEDERAL government.

Do you have anything to say about that? Or are you forced to restrict your comments to gloating, derision, and scorn?

32 posted on 01/19/2016 2:22:25 PM PST by Finny (Voting "against" is a wish. Be ready to own what you vote for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Finny

I’ve noticed Finny that you seem to play hallway monitor on here at all times. You seem to have a lot of time on your hands. You should spend more time analyzing your candidates excessive flip flops and explanations for every issue than to worry about Trump’s position on ethanol. But since you asked, in the grand scheme of things, ethanol is a non-issue. If Trump has to support ethanol to win Iowa, so be it. You and your crew would rather fight your last stand over an issue as trivial as ethanol ending whatever chance you’d have at solving the big issues. Your guy Cruz is trying to do that too but he’s too cute for his own good.


44 posted on 01/19/2016 2:30:01 PM PST by usafa92 (Conservative in Jersey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Finny

Good point. Trying to warn people about Trump seems to be fruitless. It is becoming more and more frightening to see the extent to which people are projecting onto Trump that which they want to see from him, and in the face of his lifetime of supporting liberal, big government type policies. This is exactly what happened with Obama in 2008, when people fell for all his “soaring rhetoric” about uniting America.


69 posted on 01/19/2016 3:17:11 PM PST by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson