Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance

That language in the 14th Amendment requires no renunciation of allegiance to the other country. So if Marco’s parents were in the country legally, they are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. An Ambassador from another country, ore anyone with diplomatic immunity, for example, would not be subject to the jurisdiction of the US. An the Congress can easily extend that to illegal invaders as well.

However, if the Supreme Court rules on this and says you have to be born on American soil of American parents, I am OK with that. It eliminates Ted and Marco, but that is OK. We still have Trump, Carson, Bush, Christy, Paul, Kasich, Fiorino, Huckabee, and Santorum to pick from.


97 posted on 01/17/2016 9:35:09 AM PST by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: SubMareener

Again, if that is the rule, then we are saying that a house guest can claim adoption into your family, based solely on their presence in your home.

And if the Supreme Court so rules, they will be once again ruling against the laws of nature, and the Constitution.

A ruling that should then be ignored, being null and void.


98 posted on 01/17/2016 9:41:23 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Cruz + Rubio doesn't even add up to one natural born citizen. Still short a citizen father.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson