Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Social Security: Surge of children named Mohammed up 10,000%
washingtonexaminer.com ^ | January 5, 2016 | PAUL BEDARD

Posted on 01/06/2016 6:03:41 AM PST by ilovesarah2012

The number of U.S. newborns named "Mohammed" has jumped 100-fold since 1964, one way of determining the growth of second and third generation Muslims, according to a leading immigration watchdog.

Based on Social Security Administration baby name figures, there were only 29 babies born with one of the spellings of Mohammed in 1964. That has surged to 2,931.

The Center for Immigration Studies used the statistics to determine the growth of the Muslim community, a statistic the federal government doesn't chart.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: invasion; islam

1 posted on 01/06/2016 6:03:41 AM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

>>>The Center for Immigration Studies used the statistics to determine the growth of the Muslim community, a statistic the federal government doesn’t chart.

Of course, that would be government profiling or government double talk!


2 posted on 01/06/2016 6:06:49 AM PST by SIRTRIS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

I wonder how many people have named a pig Mohamed?


3 posted on 01/06/2016 6:07:25 AM PST by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

Probably because 10,000 % more Muslims have been imported under this administration.


4 posted on 01/06/2016 6:07:51 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

Good question, though I doubt the proud owners would have sought a SSN for the pig.


5 posted on 01/06/2016 6:09:08 AM PST by SatinDoll (A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS BORN IN THE USA OF TWO USA CITIZENS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

What could possibly go wrong?


6 posted on 01/06/2016 6:09:15 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Rubio not voting on OmniSpend is RINO for 'smart'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

If anyone would have, in the last months of 2001, or in 2002, had predicted we’d have a president with the Muslim name Obama and raised a Muslim, and that Islam was not only being defended but supported and promoted in our nation, they would have bet a life’s fortune that it would never happen.

Showing the true origin of this change is not in the political realm - but in the spiritual one. As such, it can only be fought in that realm first.


7 posted on 01/06/2016 6:14:33 AM PST by Arlis ( A "Sacred Cow" Tipping Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

The article neglects to quote the number of newborn “Americans” given the name Osama during the late 90s and early 2000s.


8 posted on 01/06/2016 6:14:45 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie (The Bush family needs to just go away. The Clinton family needs just to go to prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

“That has surged to 2,931.”

That’s almost 3,000


9 posted on 01/06/2016 6:15:21 AM PST by FewsOrange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FewsOrange

Pretty close to Twin Towers numbers.

Ironic.


10 posted on 01/06/2016 6:18:50 AM PST by headsonpikes (Mass murder and cannibalism are the twin sacraments of socialism - "Who-whom?"-Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

It makes profiling easier.


11 posted on 01/06/2016 6:20:04 AM PST by JTHomes (Government is force.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

It makes profiling easier.


12 posted on 01/06/2016 6:20:04 AM PST by JTHomes (Government is force.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
Odd Odd! While the rendering an image of their Mohammad is too evil for any muslim to accept! BUT, naming a child is not projecting an image of Moh is not? Dumb!!!
13 posted on 01/06/2016 6:23:42 AM PST by SIRTRIS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Maybe not but I bet they registered them to vote.


14 posted on 01/06/2016 6:24:15 AM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes

I thought the same thing.


15 posted on 01/06/2016 6:26:41 AM PST by mykroar ("Never believe anything until it has been officially denied." - Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

No invasion here, diversity now!


16 posted on 01/06/2016 7:02:32 AM PST by MrBambaLaMamba (Obama - "I will stand with the Muslims")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

It would seem giving the name of the prophet to a defiled human would be an insult to islam and should require a beheading or something.


17 posted on 01/06/2016 7:10:17 AM PST by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

We have a metastasizing cancer growing in our nation.


18 posted on 01/06/2016 7:31:39 AM PST by Gritty (Syrians aren't Jews fleeing Nazi Holocaust but Nazis relocating from a bombed out Berlin-DGreenfield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson