[old curmudgeon]

First the story says “heavily armed” and later says whether armed is not known.

If they have weapons in a federal building, they have screwed up.

[Nextrush]

The people the media spoke with from the protest group would not comment on whether they were armed.......

[Ghost of SVR4]

If they have weapons in a federal building, they have screwed up. Yeah, we should cower to the almighty fed gov..F every one of them. Keep sucking up to those safe zones and citizen dis-armament zones. They (the fed) have NOTHING to fear from a citizenship; unless?

[foundedonpurpose]

Whoa! Take Your time!!!

The media propaganda is out with all their knives. They are the media and lack guns, relax as the story changes 40 times in the next day so, so they can get their story straight. Then still screw it up!!

[wideawake]

If true, this was a deeply stupid move. And I said “if” because I highly doubt the reportage is reliable.

[kiryandil]

If they have weapons in a federal building, they have screwed up.

Oh, Good God.

"A federal building". Gruberment propaganda.

The gruberment would call a 5 foot by 6 foot firewood shed "a federal building" if it served their purposes.

I make this call even before I look up the satellite phot of their "federal building".

[demshateGod]

What good does it do to fight tyranny when you’re not armed. 2A exists for such a time as this.

[Mechanicos]

Where in the 2nd does it allow the federal government to infringe on the protected right to bare arms in buildings owned by the People?

[trebb]

If they have weapons in a federal building, they have screwed up.

And if enough of the People accept that w/o a second thought, all "Uncle Sugar" has to do is declare all public buildings/areas to be under federal aegis and poof! ... No more 2nd Amendment....