Posted on 12/05/2015 12:29:41 AM PST by TroutStalker
gun control = tight grouping
They’re principled.
Democrats want to get rid of the First Amendment so they can decide what political speech can be heard.
They’re unremittingly hostile to American freedoms.
Let them run next year on a gun control/free speech regulation platform.
I’m looking forward to their wholesale repudiation.
The crime scene pillaging earlier today by the msm has given me insomnia as well.....
Yes, run on gun control especially after a recent terrorist attack!
Since the Obamacare vote didn’t get rid of enough liberals trying to disguise themselves as conservatives on Election Day and vote like a liberal the rest of the time. Hopefully this should finish them off.
Keep listening to liberal nutjobs at the NYT, please!
Wow, what took so long, I guess the NYT had to proof read Obamas screed for spelling errors.
That to make way for the mass killing fields of the Islamic Kampuchea.
They think we’re stupid.
Rogue Guns! Anti-Gun PSA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnetFL4Cc54
Here’s some news that you will NEVER read on the pages of the New York Times:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3368532/posts
I love tha psa. Crowder did it intentionally bad as he was mocking an anti gun nut.
The left has been incredibly, bizarrely and extremely irrational of late, beyond the pale even for them, ramping it up times 10 since O's re-election.
The idea that all of O's and the current left's efforts is a provocation to a civil war mentality in the US is no more extreme than an attempt to explain the left over the past 7 years as a mere political movement with certain values. There are no values, and there is no rationality to their action in service of the purported values.
At every turn, you see provocation, instigation. That's always the common thread with this administration and cohorts.
I suggest it's the only intent. There isn't a single normal Judeo Christian or American or really even any other actual value in the current White House or media. Sometimes they take the guise of traditional welfare state liberalism, sometimes pro-terrorist, sometimes pro immigrant, anti gun, climate lies. They defend demonstrably indefensible 'victims' in a way that defies logic.
All of it is stage craft, built to drive you nuts, gin you up.
But what they are building is a war amongst Americans. At every turn, the only 'value' is to stoke that war.
Wherever you look - here and around the world, wherever they've been - there is external or implicit war - civil or outright. And in every case, every action adds fuel.
The agenda of this administration is the size of the fire.
'Activism' itself is not a value. It's merely chaotic aggression.
What single thing characterizes this administration other than everyone is now against everyone, here and abroad, and everyone is ready to fight?
So this is an administration with a single aim - start fires everywhere.
I've said it before - Obama is one thing consistently: An arsonist.
What the New York Times won’t tell its readers that the gun control mecca of California didn’t prevent terrorists from securing an arsenal to commit mass murder.
What gun control laws did there was to render innocent people sitting ducks in a gallery for the bad guys to mow them down one at a time. That is evil as far as laws go.
And gun control in reality is the road to hell paved with good intentions. We have the right to defend our lives from those who want to snuff them out.
Most Americans agree which is why after every atrocity, gun sales shoot through the roof. Americans can’t wait to protect themselves and their families and they’re not going to wait for the New York Times to take that away from them.
NYT needs to STFU about the Second Amendment because its the right on which all the others depend. Without it, our freedoms are not long for this world.
I challenge the nyt to show what new laws would have made the actions of the terrorists more illegal than they already were.
California already has hyper restrictive gun laws, and gun free zones don’t do a darn thing.
Attacking the rights of the citizenry to “feel good” about having “done something” is just as bad as the slavering mad dog murderers shouting “Allah Akbar” as unarmed victims cower and die, indeed is it as if they were doing the murdering and holding the weapons themselves while saying “it’s for your own good.”
How about a ban on muzzie immigrants? That would definitely have prevented the shooting, or at least one shooter.
And it’ll impress Islamic terrorists when we make it easier for them to kill us.
F*ck the Left & their Islamic hangers-on. We’ll be waiting for them at the pass.
And we won’t give up as easily as they think.
Don’t hold your breath waiting for the New York Times to run a front page editorial lauding the virtues of Islam control.
Bill and Hillary Clinton’s Family Foundation gave $100,000 to a New York Times’ charitable fund in 2008, the same year that the paper endorsed Hillary Clinton in the hotly contested Democratic presidential primary, the Washington Free Beacon reported Monday.
The gift from the Clinton Family Foundation, the family’s charitable giving arm, went to The New York Times Neediest Cases Fund, a charity run by members of the Times Company’s board of directors and senior executives. The CFF distributes more than $1 million annually to dozens of causes, though the $100,000 was larger than the foundation’s average.
This donation and our editorial board’s endorsement of a candidate in the 2008 Democratic primary have absolutely no connection to one another
Jihadists hit Garland, Texas - Ended in seconds with a lawfully armed American
Jihadists hit San Bernardino - Multiple dead and injured, hours long siege, search and chase until found and captured.
Gun control equals dead Americans.
Gun control supporters WANT dead Americans.
We need Jihad control.
Gun control: Liberal journalists heads being lopped off enmasse by jihadis.
Because they overlooked guns protect their right to write what they want.
You can’t fix stupid at the New York Times.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.