Wow....!!
This is amazing..!
The wave is BUILDING...!!
Cruz should be getting more traction and moving up even more with current events.
I can see Carson not doing well in NH, not as many Evangelicals as there are in Iowa.
Hank’s name should not be there, he’s a shill for Strickland propane.
Finally, we're getting some realistic numbers on him.
After the events in Paris on 11/13, I will be adding this
to my posts for the next week. I'm certain our turn is
coming again soon. We stand united against Islamic
extremists, oxymoron or not.
Sounds good.
Good news for Cruz!
I like both Cruz and Trump.
Good news for Cruz.
“Trump - 29
Cruz - 12”
Um....well I guess it’s “2nd” technically.
Ted Cruz= Number One Son.
Lindsey Graham = The man who was not there.
Gravis Marketing has a very poor track record and has been sharply criticized for its methodology by candidates and campaigns in both parties. They have made some spectacularly bad calls in the past. Not saying this is wrong. But the source has a checkered history that makes me doubt it pending confirmation form another source.
Wonderful!
who’s Hank and why isn’t anyone voting for him!!???
Go Cruz :)
Go Ted!
Once again burying the lead: Trnup UP SEVENTEEN. This isn’t close, and it shows Carson has taken himself out.
Good. Cruz is my choice for Vice President.
Imagine the tops spots with people who like each other.
Hope they can hold it!
Wow — Is Andrew Hemingway really planning on running against Ayotte?
That would be GREAT — He’s an AMAZING candidate and also now a Cruz supporter! (He may have been a supporter earlier, but, when I asked him at the recent 603 Alliance Caucus whether he was going to support Cruz, he smiled but said he couldn’t answer as of yet. But the other day, I saw his name on a list of new Cruz supporters.)
As for Ayotte, she has been a disappointment and I would much prefer to vote for Conservative Andrew Hemingway.
Gravis Marketing, a nonpartisan research firm, conducted a random survey of 600 registered voters in New Hampshire regarding the presidential election and other areas on November 11, 2015. The sample includes 330 Republican Primary participants, 214 Democrats, and the remainder not planning on participating in the primary, but are planning to vote in the regular elections. The poll has a margin of error of ± 4.0% [5.4% for Republican Primary/6.7% for Democratic Primary]. The total may not round to 100% because of rounding. The polls were conducted using automated telephone calls and weighted separately for each population in the question presented.
That would be the real news of this poll (if legit).