Posted on 11/07/2015 3:46:17 PM PST by Libloather
Police officer who sued to keep vanity license plate that read 'OINK' loses his case in Indiana Supreme Court as it rules the placards are 'government speech'
Indiana's highest court ruled Friday that state officials had the right to deny a police officer an 'offensive' vanity license plate that said 'OINK.'
The unanimous Indiana Supreme Court decision found that messages on state-issued license plates amount to government speech, not constitutionally protected personal speech.
It cited a recent U.S. Supreme Court case that found Texas hadn't violated free speech rights by refusing to issue specialty license plates featuring the Confederate battle flag.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Why not: 01ENK?
The whole point of a vanity plate is to make a personal statement, which the state allows. This is absolutely insane.
If that's the case, then the State has no business charging citizens for government speech on license plates.
Seriously, can we STOP twisting the law in knots?
State plate maker: ‘We don’t want to do it.’
Citizen to court: ‘Make them do it.’
Court to citizen: ‘This is not a matter of law, it is a matter of difference, take it to the legislature or the governor.’
I don’t think either the Texas case or this one should have seen a day inside a courtroom. The Texas group could easily have just opted (and likely have) for license plate frames.
Now we have another silly precedent declaring license plates to be government speech. WTF is this? People have god given rights which are recognized in the constitution, freedom of speech being but one of them. Governments aren’t granted any rights EXCEPT those granted by the people. You don’t HAVE speech.
Aw, geez, Louie.
I agree. It’s his attempt at humor. Big deal.
We talk about the federal government needing to be smaller. The states need to dial it back also.
He should apply for a plate that says “BACON”.
The govmnt has NO protection of speach.
We do.
Period.
Let’s make this real clear.
The court issued an OPINION, not a legally binding law.
Only the LEGISLATURE may write a law, not the judiciary.
The only way a judicial opinion becomes a law is if the legislature agrees with the judicial OPINION and passes a LAW that gives the judge’s OPINION the force of LAW!!!
What the hell is so difficult to understand about that?
Damn judges cannot WRITE LAW!!!!!!!!!!
or..... 3M TA3 .....??
Looks great in someones rear view mirror.
Another Roberts-type decision from the courts - deeming something to be what it isn't so they can step on someone's rights.
I worked with a MSgt in the AF that had a vanity plate that read "LIGAFF"
Yep - stood for "Like I Give A Flying F---"
I'm guessing that the folks who issued the license didn't take to decipher it...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.