Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeeSharp

“And no doubt also proved he was indeed flying it over his neighbor’s property.”

I notice he failed to mention the zoom capability of the cam. For that reason to me it makes no difference where the physical location of the drone was, it might as well been IN the back yard. just my 2 cent.


17 posted on 10/29/2015 7:13:31 AM PDT by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: V_TWIN
I notice he failed to mention the zoom capability of the cam.

I did not think of that aspect. Think of a 20X zoom at 200'! My disgust for this 'peeping tom' just increased exponentially.

69 posted on 10/30/2015 10:18:04 AM PDT by houeto (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: V_TWIN; SeeSharp
Actually the video the judge refused to see appears to be one Boggs "reconstructed" of the flight.

He's on record as complaining the memory card of the actual flight was "missing" when he recovered his spybot.

70 posted on 10/30/2015 9:05:25 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (It's funny 'cos it's trure - Homer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson