Posted on 10/16/2015 12:44:26 PM PDT by markomalley
Yes, even the name of the new tower is horrible. "One World Trade Center." IOW, instead of promoting Americanism and our refusal to stay down after taking a blow, the Tower's name promotes globalism and "acceptance" of the third world.
yOU REALLY have done little in the truther dept have you ?
Screw Loose change
As Seen in Vanity Fair’s August 2006 Issue!
As Seen in US News & World Report’s September 11 Fifth Anniversary Issue!
As Seen in Time Magazine’s September 11, 2006 Issue!
As Seen in Phoenix New Times’ August 9, 2007 Issue!
But you believe what ever you wish the facts are that the plane left op the 19th.
I just am pointing this out since I think FACTS are important and do not want FR to be associated with Trutherism.
Look it up and report back. Thanks!
Btw, I believe maybe zero of what the corrupt media or this government says about anything.
However, you’re free to believe whatever they say. It just does not matter to me.
Why ping me to another thread just to talk about the same thing?
Please read your own comment #36. You imply that Trump was “set up” or in some manner tricked, into saying what he said about W.
My comment # 95 stands. Trump said what he said, nobody tricked or set him up. Then Jeb responded to what Trump said.
You seem to imply that Trump has a windup key in his back, and the GOPe, or the Yebbers, or whoever, are “setting up” Trump to somehow force him to make controversial and debatable statements., so the Jebsters can then attack.
I’m talking about logic here. I am not endorsing Jeb.
It seems to me this kind of “reasoning” ascribes magical unicorn powers —and mainstream support—to Jeb that he simply does not have.
Or (my question that you did not answer) did I simply misunderstand your “set up” comment?
Did you mean that Trump was setting up Jeb? And Jeb walked right into it.
This would be more logical.
After all, it WAS Trump that chucked the salvo at W, which resulted in Jeb being forced to defend his brother—right?
Logic. That’s all I’m asking.
As for your subsequent posts # 96 and # 98, these don’t address my question and I don’t even want to try to figure out what your point is
I think he meant Hurricane Sandy, at least I hope so.
Kinda mild for Trump. He did want W impeached and talked about how terrible he was in the past.
Sorry. I thought you might be interested in seeing the full interview, which deals with several subjects. My mistake.
You’re right, of course. Often I err in assuming that what’s excerpted here is all there is.
That wasn't my post. LOL!
Btw I honestly have absolutely no idea what you're talking about missy.
And why the Bin Laden family was sent away so quickly and carefully.
No more Bushes!
They are kissing cousins of those who killed so many Americans.
No more Bushes!
Saudi Arabia was behind this attack...but we attack Iraq?
No more Bushes.
You live in a libtard state anyhow so it doesn’t matter
Your mistake was in citing a particular minute and second in that thread, which clearly seemed to me to be provoking a debate that we're already having!
BLUSH!! So sorry!
This is what happens when I’m posting in a hurry instead of getting ready
to go to work!
As Emily Litella said, “Never mind!”
I’m off to work and feelin stupid!
Have a good day peg!
Question: What does that make Hillary Clinton to the Bush family?
Answer: W Bush, "my sister in-law."
https://instagram.com/p/7GXcgxGhbG/?taken-by=realdonaldtrump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.