To: jimbo123
Did Carly bother explaining exactly why American Mothers' son's lives should be lost to oust Assad?
6 posted on
10/01/2015 7:56:31 AM PDT by
skeeter
To: skeeter
Reason number one is that it is not her son[s] that will die. Reason number two through infinity, refer back to number 1.
12 posted on
10/01/2015 7:59:07 AM PDT by
sport
To: skeeter
Specifically MY SON.
Does she have children? Send them first!!!!
27 posted on
10/01/2015 8:04:15 AM PDT by
Sequoyah101
(It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
To: skeeter
Did Carly bother explaining exactly why American Mothers' son's lives should be lost to oust Assad? I never understood this fixation Clinton-type liberals and McCain-type neoconservatives have with Assad. He's obviously a brutal dictator, but so what, since that describes about half of the leaders of most Third World countries, especially when they have a civil war on their hands. What has he done specifically to threaten the United States? And is it really wise to try to overthrow a secular dictator when the alternative is either anarchy or radical Islamism?
To: skeeter
“Did Carly bother explaining exactly why American Mothers’ son’s lives should be lost to oust Assad? “
I thought we were trying to save him.
65 posted on
10/01/2015 8:36:08 AM PDT by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
To: skeeter
Did Carly bother explaining exactly why American Mothers' son's lives should be lost to oust Assad? No, she missed on that point... The last thing we need is Obama being a 'war President'...
166 posted on
10/01/2015 12:42:17 PM PDT by
GOPJ
("The Lives of Others" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE)
To: skeeter
Thank you. Not mine, Carly.
187 posted on
10/01/2015 4:24:29 PM PDT by
ventana
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson