Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kentucky passes religious-freedom act [A State Law passed in 2013 Judge Bunning ignored]
Catholic Culture ^ | March 27, 2013

Posted on 09/08/2015 3:32:19 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Overriding Gov. Steve Beshear’s veto by overwhelming margins, the Kentucky house and senate have passed religious-freedom legislation. The Catholic Conference of Kentucky supported the measure.

The short law reads:


Government shall not substantially burden a person's freedom of religion. The right to act or refuse to act in a manner motivated by a sincerely held religious belief may not be substantially burdened unless the government proves by clear and convincing evidence that it has a compelling governmental interest in infringing the specific act or refusal to act and has used the least restrictive means to further that interest. A "burden" shall include indirect burdens such as withholding benefits, assessing penalties, or an exclusion from programs or access to facilities.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; kentucky; kimdavis; religiousfreedom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 09/08/2015 3:32:19 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hugh and Series


2 posted on 09/08/2015 3:33:54 PM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Some may want to call this the Kim Davis Amendment.


3 posted on 09/08/2015 3:35:25 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eater-of-toast

Ping!
Read, and think seriously about what it means.


4 posted on 09/08/2015 3:35:43 PM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eater-of-toast

http://www.lrc.ky.gov/record/13RS/HB279.htm


5 posted on 09/08/2015 3:37:15 PM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Might be why the judge released Davis just hours ago. Better (for him) to release her on his terms than appear compelled to by, or get in a protracted fight with, the KY legislature.


6 posted on 09/08/2015 3:37:43 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (The world map will be quite different come 20 January 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Sheriff is the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of any County. Send the sheriff to take Judge Bunning into custody today, and bring him before a State Court on charges he violated State Law. The only way to rein in judicial tyranny is to confront it. If not now, when?


7 posted on 09/08/2015 3:38:34 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Ut OH Kentucky did it again!!!

...and my same question is Where was MrTurtle when all of this was going on?....

No where to be found, and no where to be heard from, and yet his position not only as a spineless sissy citizen from Kentucky, but also a spineless sissy as a Senator representing the State of Kentucky....

Seems to me that the people of Kentucky should demand his leaving not only the Senate as a Senator but as the (ahem) leader of the United States of America Senate...


8 posted on 09/08/2015 3:40:23 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 ("It's the hard working, tax paying citizens of the United States that are suffering..."Go TRUMP 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

I think Jim toasted him


9 posted on 09/08/2015 3:40:33 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

Who can Kim sue for unlawful imprisonment?

She really needs to do that.


10 posted on 09/08/2015 3:40:36 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

... motivated by a sincerely held religious belief may not be substantially burdened unless the government proves by clear and convincing evidence that it has a compelling governmental interest in infringing the specific act or refusal to act and has used the least restrictive means to further that interest...

This means that an act motivated by religious belief by an individual and interfered with by government will be reviewed by the Court under strict scrutiny, the highest scrutiny.


11 posted on 09/08/2015 3:41:04 PM PDT by Sasparilla (If you want peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

Fat Boy Christie I thought you were a Lawyer?


12 posted on 09/08/2015 3:46:52 PM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

I know.
But he can still read along.


13 posted on 09/08/2015 3:52:58 PM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: vette6387
The Sheriff is the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of any County. Send the sheriff to take Judge Bunning into custody today, and bring him before a State Court on charges he violated State Law.

I agree. Run all this by a grand jury and arrest him. Simple and legal. I'd like to see this judge in handcuffs.


14 posted on 09/08/2015 3:57:07 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is plain idiocy. Passing these laws only reinforces the idea that we need government permission in order to practice our rights. There is already a law regarding this and it’s always been there, the supreme law. It starts out like this: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...”


15 posted on 09/08/2015 3:57:30 PM PDT by FunkyZero (... I've got a Grand Piano to prop up my mortal remains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
Agree 100%. She has recourse here and I hope she's amassing a nice sum of donations to sue for unlawful imprisonment.

Kim Davis got jailed for not doing her job, yet Bowe Bergdahl is a FREE MAN and U.S. troops DIED because of his defection. This is sickening.

16 posted on 09/08/2015 4:00:02 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Kim Davis jailing may generate intense hatred for the corrupt federal judiciary. I would hate to see . . . never mind.


17 posted on 09/08/2015 4:12:53 PM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I don't like these standard worded Acts:

Government shall not substantially burden a person's freedom of religion. The right to act or refuse to act in a manner motivated by a sincerely held religious belief may not be substantially burdened unless the government proves by clear and convincing evidence that it has a compelling governmental interest in infringing the specific act or refusal to act and has used the least restrictive means to further that interest. A "burden" shall include indirect burdens such as withholding benefits, assessing penalties, or an exclusion from programs or access to facilities.

The "substantial" qualifier is a weasel word, and is completely unnecessary. It gives any lawyer the opening to construe "substantial" any way he wants, and a leftist court will side with the Marxists every time.

Is should be all or nothing.

18 posted on 09/08/2015 4:21:20 PM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Still a lot more Good people in Kentucky than them like Beshears—and Bunning. Perhaps this vote explains why Bunning was in a rush to free Kim Davis? She was apolitical prisoner from the git go—and her release was also politics.But the TYRANNY continues. “We have to keep pressing!”


19 posted on 09/08/2015 4:23:34 PM PDT by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

State laws no longer count. In fact, state constitutions no longer count. Nor, really, does the US constitution. Nothing counts except the whimsy of an aging gay judge and his friends. Then it is THE RULE OF LAW.


20 posted on 09/08/2015 4:29:49 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson