To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Sounds like a recipe for fried chicken to me.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
How did chicken coops ever function before electricity?
3 posted on
08/08/2015 8:13:07 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Remind me, which Constitutional Amendment mentions Chicken Coops again?
5 posted on
08/08/2015 8:14:25 PM PDT by
Kickass Conservative
(THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses... RIP Roddy Piper.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
If the feds spend it, you can bet it is wasted.
6 posted on
08/08/2015 8:15:12 PM PDT by
Fungi
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Ridiculous American Program for Energy
8 posted on
08/08/2015 8:15:25 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: al baby; Albion Wilde; Allegra; BufordP; EveningStar; Gefn; GunsareOK; JRios1968; Lazamataz; ...
Why did the solar-powered chicken cross the road?
DANG!
9 posted on
08/08/2015 8:15:36 PM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Democrats and GOP-e: a difference of degree, not philosophy)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I am glad that we have the money for this foolishness. /s
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
As long as it’s just government money........
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
and wind turbines in latrines
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Do they need to charge their IPhones?
13 posted on
08/08/2015 8:43:28 PM PDT by
SuzyQue
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I have two chicken coops. I go in there to feed and water them and to collect the eggs. Electricity not needed.
14 posted on
08/08/2015 8:46:53 PM PDT by
jy8z
(When push comes disguised as nudge, I do not budge.)
To: 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; alrea; America_Right; ...
16 posted on
08/08/2015 8:51:39 PM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Democrats and GOP-e: a difference of degree, not philosophy)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The ammonia from the chicken flickins is going to be pretty hard on the electronics.
17 posted on
08/08/2015 9:03:01 PM PDT by
null and void
(If the government can't protect the Marines, how can we expect it to protect us?)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Not one word about the energy required to produce a bank of batteries capable of storing one megawatt of power or the inverters it will take to turn it into AC...oh NO! You don’t suppose they will rewire the base to use DC, do you?
18 posted on
08/08/2015 9:07:34 PM PDT by
econjack
(I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; All
Thank you for referencing that article Tolerance Sucks Rocks. Please bear in mind that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.
This is another 17th Amendment-related issue. More about 17th Amendment shortly.
As mentioned in related threads, previous generations of state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified that the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate agricultural production.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited. None to regulate agricultural production is given, and therefore legislation by Congress for that purpose is forbidden [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
State sovereignty-respecting justices had also clarified that Congress cannot appropriate taxes in the name of state power issues, essentially any issue that Congress cannot justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers, agricultural production an example.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
Getting back to the 17th Amendment, the reason that the feds are providing vote-winning funds for solar panels for agricultural purposes is this. The corrupt Senate failed to protect the states, as the Founding States had intended for the Senate to do, by killing House appropriations bills which not only steal unique, 10th Amendment-protected power of the people, farmers managing their own farms in this case, but also steals farm income in the form of unconstitutional federal taxes to pay for the solar panels for farms in this example.
The ill-conceived 17th Amendment needs to disappear, and corrupt, Constitution-ignoring senators along with it.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Obama needs to study the “life cycle of chicken feed”. Its final form is detrimental to both the illumination on solar panels, and the electronics in them.
23 posted on
08/09/2015 4:37:52 AM PDT by
norwaypinesavage
(The Stone Age did not end because we ran out of stones)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Is this for heating or cooling the coops? All I see is a way to drive up the price of eggs and chicken.
24 posted on
08/09/2015 4:53:49 AM PDT by
GailA
(If You don't keep your Promises to Our Troops, you won't keep them to anyone. Ret. SCPO's wife)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; All
As a former and future Chicken Farmer, it’s true! Chickens, throughout the ages, have NOT been able to survive without electricity!
*SMIRK*
You know, with the the amount of roof space on a huge chicken barn, this kind of does make sense,. However, funding this ‘alternative energy boondoggle’ with tax dollars, as always, DOES NOT!
25 posted on
08/09/2015 5:25:42 AM PDT by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
