Posted on 08/07/2015 2:36:13 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Susan Sarandon is a saggy-breasted has been whose boy toy dumped her. In other words, a hag!
I would say shut up and act, but she can’t even do that very well.
She and Timmy deserved each other. IIRC, both vowed to move from the USA if GWB were elected, and both didnt
She looks like a boston terrier with a boob job.
When I read the title Susan Sarandon came to mind, sure enough it was her.
Why is this news KFOR? Who cares what a washed-up, dried out, communist, old hag thinks about our governor?
Get a life news people!
The guy who admitted to commission of the crime in in minimum security. Absent physical evidence, I am suspicious the prosecutor gave the guy a great deal in exchange for his testimony against the condemned man.
It is cases like this that have turned me against the death penalty in most cases.
You can bet the prosecutor has withheld exculpatory evidence.
The guy who admitted to commission of the crime in in minimum security. Absent physical evidence, I am suspicious the prosecutor gave the guy a great deal in exchange for his testimony against the condemned man.
It is cases like this that have turned me against the death penalty in most cases.
You can bet the prosecutor has withheld exculpatory evidence.
“”and a woman, so it’s even more discouraging,” Sarandon said.””
It could be said Sarandon is a woman also and that’s always been discouraging to the rest of us!!! Surely we could have done better than making this hag a “star.”
“Susan Sarandon”
An American hating Communist with saggy boobs and skin to match. A has-been for 40 years.
“She and Timmy deserved each other. IIRC, both vowed to move from the USA if GWB were elected, and both didn’t”
Now isn’t that just like commie liberals! Threaten to move ( i.e. stamp their feet) if the people don’t vote “their way,” and then go into hiding when their “wishes” are not “honored.”
That looks like Robert Redford did a Caitlyn Jenner.
Affirmative exculpatory evidence or not, how do you condemn a guy in a he said - he said type situation unless there’s a decent amount of physical evidence or else the witness is totally believable and the defendant seems like an absolute shyster? (I know nothing about the case, so that scenario may not be in play here, just a general observation about believing the guy who admitted committing the crime claiming someone else made him do it, and sentencing that guy, who claims innocence to a heavier sentence than the witness. The juries must have seen a lot more than we can see here, or I can’t believe two of them would have done that.)
Just for the general FYI, this is the case that led to SCOTUS to give Oklahoma the go ahead with the “three drug” lethal injection incorporating midazolam instead of phenobarbitol or other more powerful sedatives that might not be available.
It’s also the case where “The Wise Latina” dissented with a rant about the ruling opening the door for drawing and quartering as a form of execution. Yeah.
As for Glossip’s guilt or innocence, here’s the facts of the case and the procedural challenges in the appeal, from Findlaw: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ok-court-of-criminal-appeals/1466730.html
The guy sure doesn’t sound innocent to me.
Defending the life of a murderer but OK with the parting out of a baby in its mothers womb. A true INSANE lib.
And did a fine job of it, too.
However, I once played the voice of God in a school skit, so clearly I outrank her.
Has there been a maggot in the last 20 years that Sleazin’ Sarandon hasn’t defended?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.