Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama ‘Modifies’ U.S. Oath of Allegiance to Accommodate Muslims
Human Events ^ | Thursday Aug 6, 2015 | Raymond Ibrahim

Posted on 08/06/2015 12:07:03 PM PDT by bob_denard

The Obama administration recently made changes to the Oath of Allegiance to the United States in a manner very conducive to Sharia, or Islamic law.

On July 21, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced some “modifications” to the Oath of Allegiance which immigrants must take before becoming naturalized.

The original oath required incoming citizens to declare that they will “bear arms on behalf of the United States” and “perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States” when required by the law.

Now the USCIS says that “A candidate [to U.S. citizenship] may be eligible to exclude these two clauses based on religious training and belief or a conscientious objection.”

The new changes further add that new candidates “May be eligible for [additional?] modifications based on religious training and belief, or conscientious objection arising from a deeply held moral or ethical code.”

These changes serve incoming Islamic supremacists especially well. For, while Islamic law allows Muslims to feign loyalty to non-Muslim “infidel” authorities, it bans Muslims from living up to the pretense by actually fighting or killing fellow Muslims on behalf of a non-Muslim entity, such as the United States.

(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antiamericanism; cultureofcorruption; fifthcolumnists; islamicimperialism; islamiclaw; islamicoath; loyaltyoath; muslimbrotherhood; oathofallegiance; obamaforeignpolicy; obamalegacy; obamaonreligion; obamascandals; proislamist; searchworks; uscis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 08/06/2015 12:07:03 PM PDT by bob_denard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bob_denard

“A candidate [to U.S. citizenship] may be eligible to exclude these two clauses based on religious training and belief or a conscientious objection.”

...words fail. This is the most infuriating crap I’ve read since...probably this morning.


2 posted on 08/06/2015 12:11:17 PM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bob_denard

3 posted on 08/06/2015 12:12:04 PM PDT by Doogle (( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bob_denard

WTF?


4 posted on 08/06/2015 12:12:09 PM PDT by golfisnr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bob_denard

‘O the TRAIOTER


5 posted on 08/06/2015 12:12:34 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bob_denard

“These changes serve incoming Islamic supremacists especially well. For, while Islamic law allows Muslims to feign loyalty to non-Muslim “infidel” authorities, it bans Muslims from living up to the pretense by actually fighting or killing fellow Muslims on behalf of a non-Muslim entity, such as the United States.”

This is precisely why Muslims aren’t killing each other in the middle east. Oh wait....


6 posted on 08/06/2015 12:12:41 PM PDT by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz; AuntB; La Lydia; sickoflibs; stephenjohnbanker; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; 2ndDivisionVet; ...

Can Obama do this ???

or is this just another thing that comes under the jurisdiction of the congress ???

This is a serious sell out ...

Treason on steroids...


7 posted on 08/06/2015 12:13:38 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bob_denard

It is unbelievable that a president alone can modify this oath. And I don’t simply mean a lawless president like Obama. Any modification to that oath should require the same approvals as a new law.


8 posted on 08/06/2015 12:14:33 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bob_denard

And Congress does NOTHING.


9 posted on 08/06/2015 12:16:19 PM PDT by bgill ( CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bob_denard
What next will obama implement sharia law to accommodate muslims?
10 posted on 08/06/2015 12:18:37 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bob_denard

So no more draft.


11 posted on 08/06/2015 12:18:55 PM PDT by Churchillspirit (9/11/2001 and 9/11/2012: NEVER FORGET.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bob_denard

So let me get this right. Those taking the oath can opt out of the true oath because of their religion , but Christians here have to accept , no they are told to accept the homosexual movement and agenda while ignoring their own religious beliefs.

Screw you divider in chief


12 posted on 08/06/2015 12:18:58 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bob_denard

Its like ths southpark episode all you hear is SHXT.


13 posted on 08/06/2015 12:20:51 PM PDT by Uversabound (Our Military past and present: Our Highest example of Brotherhood of Man & Doing God's Will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bob_denard

Someone wanna tell me again that Obama is not a muslim?

Seriously. Anyone with a strait face?

Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton... They all combined are not half as evil as Obastard.


14 posted on 08/06/2015 12:21:22 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bob_denard

To all you Dem voters, an old computer axiom: garbage in....garbage out.


15 posted on 08/06/2015 12:24:01 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bob_denard

If Muslims don’t want to take on all the responsibilities of citizenship, they should not be granted citizenship.


16 posted on 08/06/2015 12:29:25 PM PDT by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bob_denard

The public has its head up its anal exit passageway and doesn’t know or care. The media aid and abet the criminal administration. Net result: 0 does whatever the hell he wants.


17 posted on 08/06/2015 12:32:29 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bob_denard; Liz; Tennessee Nana

18 posted on 08/06/2015 12:33:19 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Democrats and GOP-e: a difference of degree, not philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz; Tennessee Nana

19 posted on 08/06/2015 12:33:49 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Democrats and GOP-e: a difference of degree, not philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bob_denard
I'm sure Muhammed Ali will be relieved to see these changes...

"Oh sure....now."

20 posted on 08/06/2015 12:34:16 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Democracy is not freedom. Democracy is simply majoritarianism. It is incompatible with real freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson