
Image: RecA prepared by Kirk Durston using MacPyMOL.
Full title:
Computing the “Best Case” Probability of Proteins from Actual Data, and Falsifying a Prediction of Darwinism
Kirk Durston
July 28, 2015 4:52 PM
Such faith evolutionists have! They’ve never come close to creating a single protein via random processes. Such stupendous complexity has been likened to having a solar system full of blind men all simultaneously solving the Rubik’s Cube. And the most “simple” stupendously complex cell requires dozens of such proteins, a selectively permeable cell membrane, cytoplasm, organelles and the most complex code in the universe: DNA. Irreducible complexity indeed.
Poor life science guys, probability theory just won’t go away. It has always amazed me that the understanding of odds that are based on probability that make Vegas money hand over fist, can’t be understood by very smart people when applied to the complexity of the DNA molecule.
Darwin based assumptions on a simple cell, we now know better. When will the life science guys finally admit the mathematicians have them boxed in?